[PATCH][RFC] acpi: method: refine _EVT test

Alex Hung alex.hung at canonical.com
Fri Jul 31 14:30:47 UTC 2015


Loop in two developers for discussion :).

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com> wrote:
> There is a side-effect on this patch that I'd like to discuss (therefore
> RFC in topic).
>
> When I run "sudo make check", it shows an failure as below:
>
> < method          _EVT.
> ---
>> method          _AEI.
>
> As it is the result of below:
>
> method          Test 2 of 180: Test _AEI.
> method          SKIPPED: Test 2, Skipping test for non-existant object
> method          _AEI.
> method
> method          Test 3 of 180: Test _EVT (Event Method).
> method          SKIPPED: Test 3, Skipping test for non-existant object
> method          _AEI.
>
> From function perspective, the patch works fine but it may not look
> quite the same as other methods.  Does anyone have any comments?
>
>
> On 07/31/2015 09:44 PM, Alex Hung wrote:
>> According to ACPI spec, _EVT's events should be in adjacent _AEI
>> control method.  This patch also reduces lengthy testing time.
>>
>> This was modified from a patch from Fan Wu <wufan at codeaurora.org>
>> Most changes are styles, comments and some small code refactoring.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  src/acpi/method/method.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
>> index 638e937..732facc 100644
>> --- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
>> +++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>  #include <inttypes.h>
>>  #include "fwts_acpi_object_eval.h"
>>
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * ACPI methods + objects used in Linux ACPI driver:
>>   *
>> @@ -958,21 +959,86 @@ static int method_test_AEI(fwts_framework *fw)
>>               "_AEI", NULL, 0, method_test_AEI_return, NULL);
>>  }
>>
>> -static int method_test_EVT(fwts_framework *fw)
>> +static void check_evt_event (
>> +     fwts_framework *fw,
>> +     ACPI_RESOURCE_GPIO *gpio)
>>  {
>>       ACPI_OBJECT arg[1];
>> -     int ret, i;
>> +     ACPI_HANDLE evtMethodHandle;
>> +     ACPI_STATUS Status;
>> +     char Path[256];
>> +     uint16_t i;
>> +
>> +     /* Skip the leading spaces in ResourceSource. */
>> +     for (i = 0; i < gpio->ResourceSource.StringLength; i++) {
>> +             if (gpio->ResourceSource.StringPtr[i] != ' ')
>> +                     break;
>> +     }
>>
>> -     arg[0].Type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
>> -     for (i = 0; i < 65535; i++) {
>> -             arg[0].Integer.Value = i;
>> -             ret = method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL,
>> -                     "_EVT", arg, 1, method_test_NULL_return, NULL);
>> +     if (i == gpio->ResourceSource.StringLength ) {
>> +             fwts_log_warning(fw, "Invalid ResourceSource");
>> +             return;
>> +     }
>>
>> -             if (ret != FWTS_OK)
>> -                     break;
>> +     /* Get the handle of return;the _EVT method. */
>> +     sprintf (Path, "%s._EVT", &gpio->ResourceSource.StringPtr[i]);
>> +
>> +     Status = AcpiGetHandle (NULL, Path, &evtMethodHandle);
>> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(Status)) {
>> +             fwts_log_warning(fw, "Failed to find valid handle for EVT method (0x%x), %s",   Status, Path);
>> +             return;
>>       }
>> -     return ret;
>> +
>> +     /* Call the _EVT method with all the pins defined for the GpioInt */
>> +     for (i = 0; i < gpio->PinTableLength; i++) {
>> +             ACPI_OBJECT_LIST  arg_list;
>> +
>> +             arg[0].Type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
>> +             arg[0].Integer.Value = gpio->PinTable[i];
>> +             arg_list.Count   = 1;
>> +             arg_list.Pointer = arg;
>> +
>> +             method_evaluate_found_method(fw, Path, method_test_NULL_return, NULL, &arg_list);
>> +     }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void method_test_EVT_return (
>> +     fwts_framework *fw,
>> +     char *name,
>> +     ACPI_BUFFER *buf,
>> +     ACPI_OBJECT *obj,
>> +     void *private)
>> +{
>> +     ACPI_RESOURCE *resource;
>> +     ACPI_STATUS   Status;
>> +
>> +     FWTS_UNUSED(buf);
>> +     FWTS_UNUSED(private);
>> +
>> +     if (method_check_type(fw, name, buf, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) != FWTS_OK)
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     Status = AcpiBufferToResource( obj->Buffer.Pointer, obj->Buffer.Length, &resource );
>> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(Status))
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     do {
>> +             if (!resource->Length) {
>> +                     fwts_log_warning(fw, "Invalid zero length descriptor in resource list\n");
>> +                     break;
>> +             }
>> +
>> +             if (resource->Type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GPIO && resource->Data.Gpio.ConnectionType == ACPI_RESOURCE_GPIO_TYPE_INT)
>> +                             check_evt_event(fw, &resource->Data.Gpio);
>> +
>> +             resource = ACPI_NEXT_RESOURCE(resource);
>> +     } while (resource->Type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_END_TAG);
>> +}
>> +static int method_test_EVT(fwts_framework *fw)
>> +{
>> +     /* Only test the _EVT method with pins defined in AEI. */
>> +     return method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL,
>> +             "_AEI", NULL, 0, method_test_EVT_return, NULL);
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Alex Hung



-- 
Cheers,
Alex Hung



More information about the fwts-devel mailing list