ACK: [PATCH] acpi: method: add support for _CPC revision 2
ivanhu
ivan.hu at canonical.com
Tue Jul 21 04:04:30 UTC 2015
On 2015年07月20日 14:37, Alex Hung wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
> ---
> src/acpi/method/method.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> index 4fbfa90..d0b98e6 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> @@ -2898,7 +2898,9 @@ static void method_test_CPC_return(
> ACPI_OBJECT *obj,
> void *private)
> {
> - static fwts_package_element elements[] = {
> + uint8_t revision;
> +
> + static fwts_package_element elementsv1[] = {
> { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, "Number of Entries" },
> { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, "Revision" },
> { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Highest Performance" },
> @@ -2918,18 +2920,61 @@ static void method_test_CPC_return(
> { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Enable Register" }
> };
>
> + static fwts_package_element elementsv2[] = {
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, "Number of Entries" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, "Revision" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Highest Performance" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Nominal Performance" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Lowest Non Linear Performance" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Lowest Performance" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Guaranteed Performance Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Desired Performance Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Minimum Performance Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Maximum Performance Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Performance Reduction Tolerance Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Timed Window Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Counter Wraparound Time" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Reference Performance Counter Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Delivered Performance Counter Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Performance Limited Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "CPPC Enable Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Autonomous Selection Enable" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Autonomous Activity Window Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, "Energy Performance Preference Register" },
> + { ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, "Reference Performance" }
> + };
> +
> FWTS_UNUSED(private);
>
> if (method_check_type(fw, name, buf, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) != FWTS_OK)
> return;
>
> - /* Something is really wrong if we don't have any elements in _CPC */
> - if (method_package_count_equal(fw, name, "_CPC", obj, 17) != FWTS_OK)
> - return;
> + revision = obj->Package.Elements[1].Integer.Value;
> +
> + if (revision == 1) { // acpi 5.0
> + /* Something is really wrong if we don't have any elements in _CPC */
> + if (method_package_count_equal(fw, name, "_CPC", obj, 17) != FWTS_OK)
> + return;
> +
> + /* For now, just check types */
> + if (method_package_elements_type(fw, name, "_CPC", obj, elementsv1, 17) != FWTS_OK)
> + return;
> + } else if (revision == 2) { // acpi 5.1 and later
> + /* Something is really wrong if we don't have any elements in _CPC */
> + if (method_package_count_equal(fw, name, "_CPC", obj, 21) != FWTS_OK)
> + return;
> +
> + /* For now, just check types */
> + if (method_package_elements_type(fw, name, "_CPC", obj, elementsv2, 21) != FWTS_OK)
> + return;
> + } else {
> + fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH,
> + "Method_CPCBadRevision",
> + "_CPC's _REV is incorrect, "
> + "expecting 1 or 2, got 0x%" PRIx8 , revision);
>
> - /* For now, just check types */
> - if (method_package_elements_type(fw, name, "_CPC", obj, elements, 17) != FWTS_OK)
> return;
> + }
>
> method_passed_sane(fw, name, "package");
> }
Acked-by: Ivan Hu<ivan.hu at canonical.com>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list