[PATCH 1/2] acpi: tpm2: Add ACPI TPM2 test

Colin Ian King colin.king at canonical.com
Wed Jul 15 11:01:19 UTC 2015


On 15/07/15 12:00, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Thanks Alex,
> 
> Just some extra checks and fixes need some attention.
> 
> Colin
> 
> On 15/07/15 10:57, Alex Hung wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  src/Makefile.am             |  1 +
>>  src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c        | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  src/lib/include/fwts_acpi.h | 25 ++++++++----
>>  3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c
>>
>> diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am
>> index 3a77196..ba626f0 100644
>> --- a/src/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/src/Makefile.am
>> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ fwts_SOURCES = main.c 				\
>>  	acpi/spcr/spcr.c 			\
>>  	acpi/spmi/spmi.c 			\
>>  	acpi/tcpa/tcpa.c 			\
>> +	acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c 			\
>>  	acpi/srat/srat.c 			\
>>  	acpi/syntaxcheck/syntaxcheck.c 		\
>>  	acpi/uefi/uefi.c			\
>> diff --git a/src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c b/src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6061224
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2010-2015 Canonical
>> + *
>> + * Portions of this code original from the Linux-ready Firmware Developer Kit

BTW: The above line referencing the Linux-ready Firmware Developer Kit
is not valid as it is cleanly implemented new code.

>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
>> + * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#include "fwts.h"
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <inttypes.h>
>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>> +
>> +static fwts_acpi_table_info *table;
>> +
>> +static int tpm2_init(fwts_framework *fw)
>> +{
>> +	if (fwts_acpi_find_table(fw, "TPM2", 0, &table) != FWTS_OK) {
>> +		fwts_log_error(fw, "Cannot load ACPI table");
>> +		return FWTS_ERROR;
>> +	}
>> +	if (table == NULL) {
>> +		fwts_log_error(fw, "ACPI TPM2 table does not exist, skipping test");
>> +		return FWTS_ERROR;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return FWTS_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * TPM2 table
>> + *   available @ https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/files/static_page_files/5DB17390-1A4B-B294-D029166C91F3512B/TCG_D-RTM_Architecture_v1%200_Published_06172013.pdf
>> + */
> 
> Is that where TPM2 is described? I found the link as
> http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/files/static_page_files/648D7D46-1A4B-B294-D088037B8F73DAAF/TCG_ACPIGeneralSpecification_1-10_0-37-Published.pdf
> 
> via http://www.uefi.org/acpi (see under TPM2)
> 
> 
>> +static int tpm2_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
>> +{
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_tpm2 *tpm2 = (fwts_acpi_table_tpm2*) table->data;
>> +	bool passed = true;
>> +
>> +	fwts_log_info_verbatum(fw, "TPM2 Table:");
>> +	fwts_log_info_verbatum(fw, "  Platform Class:                  0x%4.4"   PRIx16, tpm2->platform_class);
>> +	fwts_log_info_verbatum(fw, "  Reserved:                        0x%4.4"   PRIx32, tpm2->reserved);
>> +	fwts_log_info_verbatum(fw, "  Address of Control Area:         0x%16.16" PRIx64, tpm2->address_of_control_area);
>> +	fwts_log_info_verbatum(fw, "  Start Method:                    0x%8.8"   PRIx32, tpm2->start_method);
>> +
>> +	if (tpm2->platform_class != 0 && tpm2->platform_class != 1) {
>> +		passed = false;
>> +		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH,
>> +			"TPM2BadPlatformClass",
>> +			"TPM2's platform class must be zero or one, got 0x%" PRIx16,
>> +			tpm2->platform_class);
> 
> maybe worth writing:
> 
> "TPM2's platform class must be zero (client) or one (server), got 0x%"
> 
> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (tpm2->reserved != 0) {
>> +		passed = false;
>> +		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_LOW,
>> +			"TPM2ReservedNonZero",
>> +			"TPM2 reserved field must be zero, got "
>> +			"0x%4.4" PRIx16 " instead", tpm2->reserved);
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> A start_method of zero is apparently not allowed. (indicates value has
> not been set).
> 
> 
>> +	if (tpm2->start_method >= 9) {
>> +		passed = false;
>> +		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH,
>> +			"TPM2BadStartMethod",
>> +			"TPM2's Start Method greater than 8 is reserved, got 0x%" PRIx16,
>> +			tpm2->start_method);
>> +	}
> 
> What about checks to the platform_specific_parameters field?
> 
> According to the specification "If the Start Method value is 2 then this
> field is four bytes in size and must be all zero."
> 
> Since the table is variable sized because of the
> platform_specific_parameters, it may be worth also checking to see if
> table->length is sane, e.g.
> 
> 	at least the size of sizeof(fwts_acpi_table_tpm2)
> 
> and if start_method is 2, should be at least
> sizeof(fwts_acpi_table_tpm2) + 4
> 
> 
>> +
>> +	if (passed)
>> +		fwts_passed(fw, "No issues found in TPM2 table.");
>> +
>> +	return FWTS_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static fwts_framework_minor_test tpm2_tests[] = {
>> +	{ tpm2_test1, "Validate TPM2 table." },
>> +	{ NULL, NULL }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static fwts_framework_ops tpm2_ops = {
>> +	.description = "Trusted Platform Module 2 test.",
> 
> To be the same as other ACPI table tests, it should be:
> 
> 	"TPM2 Trusted Platform Module 2 test"
> 
>> +	.init        = tpm2_init,
>> +	.minor_tests = tpm2_tests
>> +};
>> +
>> +FWTS_REGISTER("tpm2", &tpm2_ops, FWTS_TEST_ANYTIME, FWTS_FLAG_BATCH | FWTS_FLAG_TEST_ACPI)
>> diff --git a/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi.h b/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi.h
>> index 65d5e12..61f7129 100644
>> --- a/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi.h
>> +++ b/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi.h
>> @@ -78,13 +78,13 @@ typedef struct {
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_table_header;
>>  
>>  typedef struct {
>> -	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;	
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
>>  	uint8_t		cmos_index;
>>  	uint8_t		reserved[3];
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_table_boot;
>>  
>>  typedef struct {
>> -	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;	
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
>>  	uint32_t	boot_error_region_length;
>>  	uint64_t	boot_error_region;
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_table_bert;
>> @@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ typedef struct {
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_cpep_processor_info;
>>  
>>  typedef struct {
>> -	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;	
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
>>  	uint8_t		reserved[8];
>>  	fwts_acpi_cpep_processor_info	cpep_info[0];
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_table_cpep;
>>  
>>  typedef struct {
>> -	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;	
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
>>  	fwts_acpi_gas	ec_control;
>>  	fwts_acpi_gas	ec_data;
>>  	uint32_t	uid;
>> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>   *  From ACPI Spec, section 5.2.9 Fixed ACPI Description Field
>>   */
>>  typedef struct {
>> -	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;	
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
>>  	uint32_t	firmware_control;
>>  	uint32_t	dsdt;
>>  	uint8_t		reserved;
>> @@ -393,14 +393,14 @@ typedef struct {
>>  
>>  /* Type 3, FWTS_ACPI_MADT_NMI_SOURCE */
>>  typedef struct {
>> -	uint16_t	flags;	
>> +	uint16_t	flags;
>>  	uint32_t	gsi;
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_madt_nmi;
>>  
>>  /* Type 4, FWTS_ACPI_MADT_LOCAL_APIC_NMI */
>>  typedef struct {
>>  	uint8_t		acpi_processor_id;
>> -	uint16_t	flags;	
>> +	uint16_t	flags;
>>  	uint8_t		local_apic_lint;
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_madt_local_apic_nmi;
>>  
> 
> The above white space clean ups probably should be in a separate patch
> just because it's not to do with this TPM2 change.
> 
>> @@ -535,6 +535,15 @@ typedef struct {
>>  	};
>>  }  __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_table_tcpa;
>>  
>> +typedef struct {
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
>> +	uint16_t	platform_class;
>> +	uint16_t	reserved;
>> +	uint64_t	address_of_control_area;
>> +	uint32_t	start_method;
>> +	uint8_t		platform_specific_parameters[0];
>> +}  __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_table_tpm2;
>> +
>>  /* From http://wiki.xenproject.org/mediawiki/images/c/c4/Xen-environment-table.pdf */
>>  typedef struct {
>>  	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
>> @@ -812,7 +821,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>  
>>  /* Section 14.1, Platform Communications Channel Table */
>>  typedef struct {
>> -	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;	
>> +	fwts_acpi_table_header	header;
> 
> ..and the above white space clean up probably should be in a separate
> patch just because it's not to do with this TPM2 change.
> 
>>  	uint32_t	flags;
>>  	uint8_t		reserved[8];
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed)) fwts_acpi_table_pcct;
>>
> 




More information about the fwts-devel mailing list