[PATCH] acpi: method: fix incorrect type comparison of ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF (LP: #1362426)
Keng-Yu Lin
keng-yu.lin at canonical.com
Thu Aug 28 06:54:06 UTC 2014
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com> wrote:
> when type is ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, it should compare against with
> ACPI_TYPE_INTEGRE or ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER. This will fix the errors when
> running method test on _CPC methods
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
> ---
> src/acpi/method/method.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> index a98cd9e..20e9ce3 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@
> #define METHOD_OPTIONAL 2
> #define METHOD_MOBILE 4
>
> +#define ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF (ACPI_TYPE_INVALID + 1)
> +
> #define method_check_type(fw, name, buf, type) \
> method_check_type__(fw, name, buf, type, #type)
>
> @@ -271,6 +273,19 @@ typedef void (*method_test_return)(fwts_framework *fw, char *name,
>
> /****************************************************************************/
>
> +static bool method_type_matches(ACPI_OBJECT_TYPE t1, ACPI_OBJECT_TYPE t2)
> +{
> + if (t1 == ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF &&
> + (t2 == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER || t2 == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (t2 == ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF &&
> + (t1 == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER || t1 == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER))
> + return true;
> +
> + return t1 == t2;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * method_passed_sane()
> * helper function to report often used passed messages
> @@ -586,7 +601,7 @@ static int method_check_type__(
>
> obj = buf->Pointer;
>
> - if (obj->Type != type) {
> + if (!method_type_matches(obj->Type, type)) {
> fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM, "MethodReturnBadType",
> "Method %s did not return %s.", name, type_name);
> return FWTS_ERROR;
> @@ -669,7 +684,7 @@ static void method_test_NULL_return(
> if (fw->acpica_mode & FWTS_ACPICA_MODE_SLACK) {
> if ((buf != NULL) && (buf->Pointer != NULL)) {
> ACPI_OBJECT *objtmp = buf->Pointer;
> - if (objtmp->Type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
> + if (method_type_matches(objtmp->Type, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)) {
> fwts_passed(fw, "%s returned an ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER as expected in slack mode.",
> name);
> return;
> @@ -754,7 +769,6 @@ static void method_test_polling_return(
> }
> }
>
> -#define ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF (ACPI_TYPE_INVALID + 1)
>
> /*
> * Common types that can be returned. This is not a complete
> @@ -800,7 +814,7 @@ static int method_package_elements_all_type(
> char tmp[128];
>
> for (i = 0; i < obj->Package.Count; i++) {
> - if (obj->Package.Elements[i].Type != type) {
> + if (!method_type_matches(obj->Package.Elements[i].Type, type)) {
> snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%sElementType", objname);
> fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM, tmp,
> "%s package element %" PRIu32 " was not the expected "
> @@ -841,7 +855,7 @@ static int method_package_elements_type(
> return FWTS_ERROR;
>
> for (i = 0; i < obj->Package.Count; i++) {
> - if (obj->Package.Elements[i].Type != info[i].type) {
> + if (!method_type_matches(obj->Package.Elements[i].Type, info[i].type)) {
> snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%sElementType", objname);
> fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM, tmp,
> "%s package element %" PRIu32 " (%s) was not the expected "
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
Acked-by: Keng-Yu Lin <kengyu at canonical.com>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list