[PATCH] acpi: method: fix incorrect type comparison of ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF (LP: #1362426)
Alex Hung
alex.hung at canonical.com
Thu Aug 28 05:31:26 UTC 2014
when type is ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF, it should compare against with
ACPI_TYPE_INTEGRE or ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER. This will fix the errors when
running method test on _CPC methods
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
---
src/acpi/method/method.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
index a98cd9e..20e9ce3 100644
--- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
+++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
@@ -250,6 +250,8 @@
#define METHOD_OPTIONAL 2
#define METHOD_MOBILE 4
+#define ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF (ACPI_TYPE_INVALID + 1)
+
#define method_check_type(fw, name, buf, type) \
method_check_type__(fw, name, buf, type, #type)
@@ -271,6 +273,19 @@ typedef void (*method_test_return)(fwts_framework *fw, char *name,
/****************************************************************************/
+static bool method_type_matches(ACPI_OBJECT_TYPE t1, ACPI_OBJECT_TYPE t2)
+{
+ if (t1 == ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF &&
+ (t2 == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER || t2 == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER))
+ return true;
+
+ if (t2 == ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF &&
+ (t1 == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER || t1 == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER))
+ return true;
+
+ return t1 == t2;
+}
+
/*
* method_passed_sane()
* helper function to report often used passed messages
@@ -586,7 +601,7 @@ static int method_check_type__(
obj = buf->Pointer;
- if (obj->Type != type) {
+ if (!method_type_matches(obj->Type, type)) {
fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM, "MethodReturnBadType",
"Method %s did not return %s.", name, type_name);
return FWTS_ERROR;
@@ -669,7 +684,7 @@ static void method_test_NULL_return(
if (fw->acpica_mode & FWTS_ACPICA_MODE_SLACK) {
if ((buf != NULL) && (buf->Pointer != NULL)) {
ACPI_OBJECT *objtmp = buf->Pointer;
- if (objtmp->Type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
+ if (method_type_matches(objtmp->Type, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)) {
fwts_passed(fw, "%s returned an ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER as expected in slack mode.",
name);
return;
@@ -754,7 +769,6 @@ static void method_test_polling_return(
}
}
-#define ACPI_TYPE_INTBUF (ACPI_TYPE_INVALID + 1)
/*
* Common types that can be returned. This is not a complete
@@ -800,7 +814,7 @@ static int method_package_elements_all_type(
char tmp[128];
for (i = 0; i < obj->Package.Count; i++) {
- if (obj->Package.Elements[i].Type != type) {
+ if (!method_type_matches(obj->Package.Elements[i].Type, type)) {
snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%sElementType", objname);
fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM, tmp,
"%s package element %" PRIu32 " was not the expected "
@@ -841,7 +855,7 @@ static int method_package_elements_type(
return FWTS_ERROR;
for (i = 0; i < obj->Package.Count; i++) {
- if (obj->Package.Elements[i].Type != info[i].type) {
+ if (!method_type_matches(obj->Package.Elements[i].Type, info[i].type)) {
snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%sElementType", objname);
fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM, tmp,
"%s package element %" PRIu32 " (%s) was not the expected "
--
1.9.1
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list