[PATCH] lib: framework: Add "unsafe" test category
Keng-Yu Lin
kengyu at canonical.com
Tue Sep 11 06:15:09 UTC 2012
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Colin King <colin.king at canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> Some tests we may add in the future (such as UEFI run time services)
> can cause the kernel to oops if the firmware is buggy, so we should
> add a new "unsafe" test category for these kinds of tests. Currently
> there are no "unsafe" tests in fwts, so this does not make any difference
> to output to fwts --show-tests until we start adding the actual tests,
> so this is a fairly benign addition.
>
> Also add the --unsafe and -U option to run unsafe tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
> ---
> src/lib/include/fwts_framework.h | 2 ++
> src/lib/src/fwts_framework.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lib/include/fwts_framework.h b/src/lib/include/fwts_framework.h
> index de28612..ad490c7 100644
> --- a/src/lib/include/fwts_framework.h
> +++ b/src/lib/include/fwts_framework.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ typedef enum {
> FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_INTERACTIVE_EXPERIMENTAL = 0x00008000,
> FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_POWER_STATES = 0x00010000,
> FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_ROOT_PRIV = 0x00020000,
> + FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_UNSAFE = 0x00040000,
> FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_TEST_BIOS = 0x01000000,
> FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_TEST_UEFI = 0x02000000,
> FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_TEST_ACPI = 0x04000000,
> @@ -235,6 +236,7 @@ static inline int fwts_tests_passed(const fwts_framework *fw)
> #define FWTS_POWER_STATES FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_POWER_STATES
> #define FWTS_UTILS FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_UTILS
> #define FWTS_ROOT_PRIV FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_ROOT_PRIV
> +#define FWTS_UNSAFE FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_UNSAFE
>
> #define FWTS_TEST_BIOS FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_TEST_BIOS
> #define FWTS_TEST_UEFI FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_TEST_UEFI
> diff --git a/src/lib/src/fwts_framework.c b/src/lib/src/fwts_framework.c
> index c6536a6..1ad3d0d 100644
> --- a/src/lib/src/fwts_framework.c
> +++ b/src/lib/src/fwts_framework.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
> FWTS_BATCH_EXPERIMENTAL | \
> FWTS_INTERACTIVE_EXPERIMENTAL |\
> FWTS_POWER_STATES | \
> - FWTS_UTILS)
> + FWTS_UTILS | \
> + FWTS_UNSAFE)
>
> #define FWTS_ARGS_WIDTH 28
> #define FWTS_MIN_TTY_WIDTH 50
> @@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ static fwts_option fwts_framework_options[] = {
> { "lp-tags-log", "", 0, "Output LaunchPad bug tags in results log." },
> { "disassemble-aml", "", 0, "Disassemble AML from DSDT and SSDT tables." },
> { "log-type", "", 1, "Specify log type (plaintext, json, html or xml)." },
> + { "unsafe", "U", 0, "Unsafe tests (tests that can potentially cause kernel oopses." },
> { NULL, NULL, 0, NULL }
> };
>
> @@ -230,6 +232,7 @@ static void fwts_framework_show_tests(fwts_framework *fw, bool full)
> { "Interactive Experimental", FWTS_INTERACTIVE_EXPERIMENTAL },
> { "Power States", FWTS_POWER_STATES },
> { "Utilities", FWTS_UTILS },
> + { "Unsafe", FWTS_UNSAFE },
> { NULL, 0 },
> };
>
> @@ -984,6 +987,9 @@ int fwts_framework_options_handler(fwts_framework *fw, int argc, char * const ar
> if (fwts_framework_log_type_parse(fw, optarg) != FWTS_OK)
> return FWTS_ERROR;
> break;
> + case 33: /* --unsafe */
> + fw->flags |= FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_UNSAFE;
> + break;
> }
> break;
> case 'a': /* --all */
> @@ -1051,6 +1057,9 @@ int fwts_framework_options_handler(fwts_framework *fw, int argc, char * const ar
> case 'u': /* --utils */
> fw->flags |= FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_UTILS;
> break;
> + case 'U': /* --unsafe */
> + fw->flags |= FWTS_FRAMEWORK_FLAGS_UNSAFE;
> + break;
> case 'v': /* --version */
> fwts_framework_show_version(stdout, argv[0]);
> return FWTS_COMPLETE;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
Acked-by: Keng-Yu Lin <kengyu at canonical.com>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list