[PATCH 23/26] uefi: csm: use uint32_t for BIOS address ranges

[Alex Hung]

On 10/15/2012 04:32 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> Rather than using plain ints, we should be using uint32_t
> for traditional 32 bit BIOS address ranges.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
> ---
>   src/uefi/csm/csm.c |    8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/uefi/csm/csm.c b/src/uefi/csm/csm.c
> index 4f755ba..b054049 100644
> --- a/src/uefi/csm/csm.c
> +++ b/src/uefi/csm/csm.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int csm_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
>   	uint8_t  *optROM;
>   	uint32_t *intVec;
>   	uint32_t int10hVec;
> -	int i;
> +	uint32_t i;
>   	int flag = 0;
>
>   	fwts_log_info(fw, "Checking for UEFI Compatibility Support Module (CSM)");
> @@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static int csm_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
>
>   	for (i=0; i<BIOS_ROM_REGION_SIZE; i+= 512) {
>   		if ((*(optROM+i) == 0x55) && (*(optROM+i+1) == 0xaa)) {
> -			int length = *(optROM+i+2) << 9;
> -			int ROMstart = BIOS_ROM_REGION_START+i;
> -			int ROMend = BIOS_ROM_REGION_START+i+length;
> +			uint32_t length = *(optROM+i+2) << 9;
> +			uint32_t ROMstart = BIOS_ROM_REGION_START+i;
> +			uint32_t ROMend = BIOS_ROM_REGION_START+i+length;
>
>   			if ((ROMstart <= int10hVec) && (int10hVec <= ROMend)) {
>   				fwts_log_info(fw, "Int 10h jumps to 0x%" PRIx32 " in option ROM at: "
>

Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>