[PATCH] uefirtvariable: Add new test for UEFI runtime GetNextVariableName

Colin Ian King colin.king at canonical.com
Fri Nov 30 09:49:45 UTC 2012


On 30/11/12 08:40, Ivan Hu wrote:
> This tests the UEFI runtime service GetNextVariableName interface by
> checking the variable name and GUID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu at canonical.com>
> ---
>   src/uefi/uefirtvariable/uefirtvariable.c |  139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 138 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/uefi/uefirtvariable/uefirtvariable.c b/src/uefi/uefirtvariable/uefirtvariable.c
> index 659c1d2..71346ee 100644
> --- a/src/uefi/uefirtvariable/uefirtvariable.c
> +++ b/src/uefi/uefirtvariable/uefirtvariable.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>   }
>
>   #define EFI_SUCCESS		0
> +#define EFI_NOT_FOUND		(14 | (1UL << 63))
>
>   #define MAX_DATA_LEMGTH		1024
>
> @@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ static int getvariable_test(fwts_framework *fw, uint32_t attributes, uint64_t da
>   		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "UEFIRuntimeGetVariableAttributes",
>   			"Failed to get variable with right attributes, "
>   			"attributes we got is %" PRIu32
> -			", but it should be %" PRIu32".",
> +			", but it should be %" PRIu32 ".",
>   			*getvariable.Attributes, attributes);
>   	return FWTS_ERROR;
>   	} else if (*getvariable.DataSize != datasize) {
> @@ -164,6 +165,127 @@ static int getvariable_test(fwts_framework *fw, uint32_t attributes, uint64_t da
>   	return FWTS_OK;
>   }
>
> +
> +static bool compare_guid(EFI_GUID *guid1, EFI_GUID *guid2)
> +{
> +	bool ident = true;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if ((guid1->Data1 != guid2->Data1) || (guid1->Data2 != guid2->Data2) || (guid1->Data3 != guid2->Data3))
> +		ident = false;
> +	else {
> +		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> +			if (guid1->Data4[i] != guid2->Data4[i])
> +				ident = false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return ident;
> +}
> +
> +static bool compare_name(uint16_t *name1, uint16_t *name2)
> +{
> +	bool ident = true;
> +	int i = 0;
> +
> +	while (true) {
> +		if ((name1[i] != name2[i])) {
> +			ident = false;
> +			break;
> +		} else if (name1[i] == '\0')
> +			break;
> +		i++;
> +	}
> +	return ident;
> +}
> +
> +static int getnextvariable_test(fwts_framework *fw, uint32_t attributes)
> +{
> +	long ioret;
> +	uint64_t status;
> +
> +	struct efi_setvariable setvariable;
> +
> +	uint64_t dataindex, datasize = 10;
> +	uint8_t data[MAX_DATA_LEMGTH];
> +
> +	struct efi_getnextvariablename getnextvariablename;
> +	uint64_t variablenamesize = MAX_DATA_LEMGTH;
> +	uint16_t variablename[MAX_DATA_LEMGTH];
> +	EFI_GUID vendorguid;
> +	bool found_name = false, found_guid = false;
> +
> +	for (dataindex = 0; dataindex < datasize; dataindex++)
> +		data[dataindex] = (uint8_t)dataindex;
> +
> +	setvariable.VariableName = variablenametest;
> +	setvariable.VendorGuid = &gtestguid1;
> +	setvariable.Attributes = attributes;
> +	setvariable.DataSize = datasize;
> +	setvariable.Data = data;
> +	setvariable.status = &status;
> +
> +	ioret = ioctl(fd, EFI_RUNTIME_SET_VARIABLE, &setvariable);
> +
> +	if (ioret == -1) {
> +		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "UEFIRuntimeSetVariable",
> +			"Failed to set variable with UEFI runtime service.");
> +		return FWTS_ERROR;
> +	}
> +
> +	getnextvariablename.VariableNameSize = &variablenamesize;
> +	getnextvariablename.VariableName = variablename;
> +	getnextvariablename.VendorGuid = &vendorguid;
> +	getnextvariablename.status = &status;
> +
> +	/* To start the search, need to pass a Null-terminated string in VariableName */
> +	variablename[0] = '\0';
> +	while (true) {
> +		variablenamesize = MAX_DATA_LEMGTH;

MAX_DATA_LEMGTH is a typo, it should be MAX_DATA_LENGTH.  I suspect this 
is in the first patch too, but I didn't spot it.


> +		ioret = ioctl(fd, EFI_RUNTIME_GET_NEXTVARIABLENAME, &getnextvariablename);
> +
> +		if (ioret == -1) {
> +
> +			/* no next variable was found*/
> +			if (*getnextvariablename.status == EFI_NOT_FOUND)
> +				break;
> +
> +			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "UEFIRuntimeGetNextVariableName",
> +				"Failed to get next variable name with UEFI runtime service.");
> +			return FWTS_ERROR;
> +		}
> +		if (compare_name(getnextvariablename.VariableName, variablenametest))
> +			found_name = true;
> +		if (compare_guid(getnextvariablename.VendorGuid, &gtestguid1))
> +			found_guid = true;
> +		if (found_name && found_guid)
> +			break;
> +	};
> +
> +	if (!found_name) {
> +		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "UEFIRuntimeGetNextVariableNameName",
> +			"Failed to get next variable name with right name.");
> +		return FWTS_ERROR;
> +	}
> +	if (!found_guid) {
> +		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "UEFIRuntimeGetNextVariableNameGuid",
> +			"Failed to get next variable name correct guid.");
> +		return FWTS_ERROR;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* delete the variable */
> +	setvariable.DataSize = 0;
> +
> +	ioret = ioctl(fd, EFI_RUNTIME_SET_VARIABLE, &setvariable);
> +
> +	if (ioret == -1) {
> +		fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "UEFIRuntimeSetVariable",
> +			"Failed to set variable with UEFI runtime service.");
> +		return FWTS_ERROR;
> +	}
> +
> +	return FWTS_OK;
> +}
> +
>   static int uefirtvariable_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
>   {
>   	uint64_t index;
> @@ -179,8 +301,23 @@ static int uefirtvariable_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
>   	return FWTS_OK;
>   }
>
> +static int uefirtvariable_test2(fwts_framework *fw)
> +{
> +	uint64_t index;
> +
> +	for (index = 0; index < (sizeof(attributesarray)/(sizeof attributesarray[0])); index++) {
> +		if (getnextvariable_test(fw, attributesarray[index]) == FWTS_ERROR)
> +			return FWTS_ERROR;
> +	}
> +
> +	fwts_passed(fw, "UEFI runtime service GetNextVariableName interface test passed.");
> +
> +	return FWTS_OK;
> +}
> +
>   static fwts_framework_minor_test uefirtvariable_tests[] = {
>   	{ uefirtvariable_test1, "Test UEFI RT service get variable interface." },
> +	{ uefirtvariable_test2, "Test UEFI RT service get next variable name interface." },
>   	{ NULL, NULL }
>   };
>
>

Apart from the typo, it's functionally good; so resend with a fixed 
version and we're good to go.

Colin



More information about the fwts-devel mailing list