[PATCH 8/8] data: klog.json: ACPICA ACPI_ERROR messages, utmutex.c
Colin King
colin.king at canonical.com
Tue Nov 20 11:28:04 UTC 2012
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
ACPICA ACPI_ERROR messages from utmutex.c
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
---
data/klog.json | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/data/klog.json b/data/klog.json
index a029b5e..bf4d084 100644
--- a/data/klog.json
+++ b/data/klog.json
@@ -77,6 +77,22 @@
"firmware_error_warning_patterns":
[
{
+ "compare_mode": "regex",
+ "log_level": "LOG_LEVEL_HIGH",
+ "tag": "FWTS_TAG_ACPI",
+ "pattern": "Mutex .* is not acquired, cannot release",
+ "advice": "An attempt to release (unlock) an ACPI related mutex has occurred. This mutex could not be released. This is most probably a bug in the AML code where a Release opcode has been executed that does not match up with an earlier corresponding Mutex opcode. It may also be a bug in the ACPI driver, but this is less likely.",
+ "label": "KlogAcpiMutexReleaseError"
+ },
+ {
+ "compare_mode": "regex",
+ "log_level": "LOG_LEVEL_HIGH",
+ "tag": "FWTS_TAG_ACPI",
+ "pattern": "Thread .* could not acquire Mutex",
+ "advice": "A mutex could not be acquired (locked) and the ACPI driver has flagged this up as an exception error. If this occurs when executing a AML Mutex opcode there could be race condition errors if the AML is not checking the return from the Mutex operation and a lot of firmware does omit this check.",
+ "label": "KlogAcpiMutexAcquireError"
+ },
+ {
"compare_mode": "string",
"log_level": "LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL",
"tag": "FWTS_TAG_ACPI",
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list