[PATCH] acpi: method: _PSS power dissipation levels can be equal to previous level

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>

With newer CPUs we are seeing _PSS power dissipation levels that are equal
to the previous level and this is not necessarily an error in the _PSS data.
For example:

P-State 0: CPU 2501 Mhz, 35000 mW, latency 10 us, bus master latency 10 us.
P-State 1: CPU 2500 Mhz, 35000 mW, latency 10 us, bus master latency 10 us.
P-State 2: CPU 2400 Mhz, 33218 mW, latency 10 us, bus master latency 10 us.
P-State 3: CPU 2300 Mhz, 31470 mW, latency 10 us, bus master latency 10 us.

This patch only flags up an error of the level is greater than the previous
level rather than greater or equal.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
---
 src/acpi/method/method.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
index 032f42e..9e81f07 100644
--- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
+++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ static void method_test_PSS_return(fwts_framework *fw, char *name, ACPI_BUFFER *
 
 		/* Sanity check descending power dissipation levels */
 		if ((i > 0) && (prev_power != 0) &&
-		    (pstate->Package.Elements[1].Integer.Value >= prev_power)) {
+		    (pstate->Package.Elements[1].Integer.Value > prev_power)) {
 			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM, "Method_PSSSubPackagePowerNotDecending",
 				"_PSS P-State sub-package %d has a larger power dissipation "
 				"setting than the previous sub-package.", i);
-- 
1.7.10.4