[Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep

[Rik Mills]

On 24/11/2022 08:36, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> It's not likely that we can build pandoc on i386, it would require
> starting building the haskell stack there, someone probably needs to
> patch flac to not build with pandoc on i386

In that case as possible solution would be: 
https://launchpad.net/~rikmills/+archive/ubuntu/bug1997533/+sourcepub/14167146/+listing-archive-extra

Sorry for no debdiff, but that does not preserve making the install file 
executable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533

Title:
  flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing
  pandoc build dep

Status in flac package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing
  pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386

  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410

  Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as
  B-D"

  This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will
  block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on
  the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12)

  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
  migration/update_excuses.html#flac

  e.g.amongst several others so far

  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
  migration/update_excuses.html#kwave

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions