[Bug 1979610] [NEW] armhf: perl modules not rebuild? Loadable Library and Binary mismatch for pspp build.

Friedrich-beckmann 1979610 at bugs.launchpad.net
Thu Jun 23 08:51:06 UTC 2022


Public bug reported:

During the build of the pspp 1.6.0-1 package for kinetic the regression
fails for the armhf architecture in the perl module tests. The reported
error is:

+PSPP.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got
handshake key 0xa480080, needed 0xa380080)

This happens only for the armhf architecture. The package build status
of the pspp 1.6.0-1 package is here:

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pspp/1.6.0-1

You can also find the buildlogs for armhf and the architectures there.

Is it possible that some perl modules have not been recompiled with the
current perl version? Or is there any idea why this could fail only on
armhf?

Regards

Friedrich

** Affects: perl (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: pspp (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Also affects: pspp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to perl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979610

Title:
  armhf: perl modules not rebuild? Loadable Library and Binary mismatch
  for pspp build.

Status in perl package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pspp package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  During the build of the pspp 1.6.0-1 package for kinetic the
  regression fails for the armhf architecture in the perl module tests.
  The reported error is:

  +PSPP.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got
  handshake key 0xa480080, needed 0xa380080)

  This happens only for the armhf architecture. The package build status
  of the pspp 1.6.0-1 package is here:

  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pspp/1.6.0-1

  You can also find the buildlogs for armhf and the architectures there.

  Is it possible that some perl modules have not been recompiled with
  the current perl version? Or is there any idea why this could fail
  only on armhf?

  Regards

  Friedrich

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/1979610/+subscriptions




More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list