[Bug 591823] Re: "File descriptor \d+ (\S+) leaked on lvs invocation."

[Bartłomiej Żogała]

Shouldn't the bug be assigned to grub(/usr/sbin/grub-probe) instead of
lvm2 as the comment here explains ?
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/433313/strange-problem-lvs-
invocation-with-grub-on-debian-stretch#comment1232731_433407

The fact that lvm did extra work towards security and detected something
shouldn't mean that we should now blame them and supress the warning
instead fixing real issue

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591823

Title:
  "File descriptor \d+ (\S+) leaked on lvs invocation."

Status in aptitude:
  Fix Released
Status in lvm2:
  Fix Released
Status in lvm2 package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  If you see messages like these:

  File descriptor 40 (/var/lib/dpkg/status) leaked on lvs invocation. Parent PID 1854: /bin/sh
  File descriptor 41 (/var/lib/dpkg/status) leaked on lvs invocation. Parent PID 1854: /bin/sh
  File descriptor 42 (/var/lib/dpkg/status) leaked on lvs invocation. Parent PID 1854: /bin/sh
  File descriptor 43 (/var/lib/dpkg/status) leaked on lvs invocation. Parent PID 1854: /bin/sh

  You can set LVM_SUPPRESS_FD_WARNINGS to suppress these warnings.

  Reference:
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581339
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432986
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=466138

  This is a slightly controversial bug and it's not yet fixed either way
  (aka fix not to leak file descriptors or stop warning by default)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/591823/+subscriptions