[Bug 1952421] Re: Issue on sshd finds correct private key for a certificate when using ssh-agent

Chloé Smith 1952421 at bugs.launchpad.net
Mon Nov 29 00:55:29 UTC 2021


** Description changed:

- Reported as https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254 upstream:
+ Reported as https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254 upstream
  
- Please take a look at line 1936 in main() function in sshd.c.
+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * HostCertificate and HostKeyAgent are not working together in sshd due 
+    to a mismatched certificate's public key and private key. The function `  `sshkey_equal_public()`` incorrectly compares the certificate's public 
+   key with a private key, never finding a match. The impact is that sshd 
+   cannot use said certificate *even though* its private key is indeed in 
+   ssh-agent.
+ 
+ * What it should do is compare the certificate's public key with a
+ public key in `sensitive_data`.
+ 
+ * Having this SRU-ed is a direct ask from one of the major cloud partners. 
+   They are currently using a customised version of the package to work 
+   around this issue, and we would like them to use a package directly from 
+   our own archive.
+ 
+  * Looping through sensitive_data.host_pubkeys[j] *instead* of 
+    sensitive_data.host_keys[j] fixes the issue
+ 
+ [https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/V_8_4/sshd.c#L1936]
  
  /* Find matching private key */
- 	for (j = 0; j < options.num_host_key_files; j++) {
- 		if (sshkey_equal_public(key,
- 			sensitive_data.host_keys[j])) {
- 			sensitive_data.host_certificates[j] = key;
- 				break;
- 			}
- 	}
+  for (j = 0; j < options.num_host_key_files; j++) {
+   if (sshkey_equal_public(key,
+    sensitive_data.host_keys[j])) {
+    sensitive_data.host_certificates[j] = key;
+     break;
+    }
+  }
  
- the sshkey_equal_public() is trying to compare a cert's pub with a private key, and it never find a match which makes sshd cannot use this certificate even though its private key is in ssh-agent.
- I believe it should be comparing a cert's public key with a public key in sensitive_data as follow.
+ vs.
  
  /* Find matching private key */
- 	for (j = 0; j < options.num_host_key_files; j++) {
- 		if (sshkey_equal_public(key,
- 			sensitive_data.host_pubkeys[j])) {
- 			sensitive_data.host_certificates[j] = key;
- 				break;
- 			}
- 	}
+  for (j = 0; j < options.num_host_key_files; j++) {
+   if (sshkey_equal_public(key,
+    sensitive_data.host_pubkeys[j])) {
+    sensitive_data.host_certificates[j] = key;
+     break;
+    }
+  }
+  
  
- https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/V_8_4/sshd.c#L1936
+ [Test Plan]
  
- Due to this HostCertificate and HostKeyAgent not working together in
- sshd and this affects every version of openssh back till Focal, at
- least.
+  * Due to the empirical nature of this bug, the test is quite straight 
+    forward. *Without* the fix, one cannot use certificates to authenticate 
+    successfully (e.g. ``sshd -c /path/to/certificate.pem``)
+    whereas with the fix (assuming the certificate matches a host key) you 
+    can create a channel.
+    
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+  * This has already been fixed both upstream and in Jammy without issue. 
+    However, if a regression where to happen it would probably be in one of 
+    two ways:
+      
+      * A dependency/reverse-dependency issue stemming from the version 
+        bump that will happen if this fix is ported. We mitigate this risk 
+        by testing for these exact types of regression, 
+        and by selecting carefully what to label this new version.
+        
+      * Accidentally breaking a set up that was made to work around this 
+        bug in the first place. The risk of this is lower, as the most 
+        likely fix is the one being implemented here anyway.  Though
+        to mitigate this more we can describe exactly what is happening 
+        with the fix in the changelog.
+ 
+ 
+ This affects every version of openssh back until Focal, at least.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952421

Title:
  Issue on sshd finds correct private key for a certificate when using
  ssh-agent

Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in openssh source package in Focal:
  New
Status in openssh source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in openssh source package in Impish:
  New

Bug description:
  Reported as https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254 upstream

  [Impact]

   * HostCertificate and HostKeyAgent are not working together in sshd due 
     to a mismatched certificate's public key and private key. The function `  `sshkey_equal_public()`` incorrectly compares the certificate's public 
    key with a private key, never finding a match. The impact is that sshd 
    cannot use said certificate *even though* its private key is indeed in 
    ssh-agent.

  * What it should do is compare the certificate's public key with a
  public key in `sensitive_data`.

  * Having this SRU-ed is a direct ask from one of the major cloud partners. 
    They are currently using a customised version of the package to work 
    around this issue, and we would like them to use a package directly from 
    our own archive.

   * Looping through sensitive_data.host_pubkeys[j] *instead* of 
     sensitive_data.host_keys[j] fixes the issue

  [https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/V_8_4/sshd.c#L1936]

  /* Find matching private key */
   for (j = 0; j < options.num_host_key_files; j++) {
    if (sshkey_equal_public(key,
     sensitive_data.host_keys[j])) {
     sensitive_data.host_certificates[j] = key;
      break;
     }
   }

  vs.

  /* Find matching private key */
   for (j = 0; j < options.num_host_key_files; j++) {
    if (sshkey_equal_public(key,
     sensitive_data.host_pubkeys[j])) {
     sensitive_data.host_certificates[j] = key;
      break;
     }
   }
   

  [Test Plan]

   * Due to the empirical nature of this bug, the test is quite straight 
     forward. *Without* the fix, one cannot use certificates to authenticate 
     successfully (e.g. ``sshd -c /path/to/certificate.pem``)
     whereas with the fix (assuming the certificate matches a host key) you 
     can create a channel.
     
  [Where problems could occur]

   * This has already been fixed both upstream and in Jammy without issue. 
     However, if a regression where to happen it would probably be in one of 
     two ways:
       
       * A dependency/reverse-dependency issue stemming from the version 
         bump that will happen if this fix is ported. We mitigate this risk 
         by testing for these exact types of regression, 
         and by selecting carefully what to label this new version.
         
       * Accidentally breaking a set up that was made to work around this 
         bug in the first place. The risk of this is lower, as the most 
         likely fix is the one being implemented here anyway.  Though
         to mitigate this more we can describe exactly what is happening 
         with the fix in the changelog.

  
  This affects every version of openssh back until Focal, at least.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1952421/+subscriptions




More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list