[Bug 1912371] Re: [MIR] flashrom

[William Wilson]

I do see now that there are built in tests, so I will update the
description. There is no debian/tests file so I will leave that part in.
Thanks for the input!

** Description changed:

  [Summary]
- There are a few issues before we can MIR this package. The package does not have a test suite that runs at build time, nor does it have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest.
+ Further review will be needed. The Package does not have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest.
  
  [Availability]
  Currently in universe.
  
  [Duplication]
  There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.
  
  [Rationale]
  fwupd depends on libflashrom1 for its flashrom plugin, something that's required to update Coreboot firmware.
  
  [Security]
  No CVE's, but due to the nature of the package security should review.
  
  [Quality Assurance]
  Package builds and runs easily
  
  [Dependencies]
  N/A
  
  [Standards Compliance]
  Complies with FHS, though the organization of files in the source package could be organized better.
  
  [Common blockers]
  flashrom does NOT have a test suite that runs at build time.
  flashrom does NOT have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest.
  
  [Maintenance]
  Actively maintained - https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom
  Packaging - https://salsa.debian.org/myczko-guest/flashrom.git

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371

Title:
  [MIR] flashrom

Status in flashrom package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Summary]
  Further review will be needed. The Package does not have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest.

  [Availability]
  Currently in universe.

  [Duplication]
  There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.

  [Rationale]
  fwupd depends on libflashrom1 for its flashrom plugin, something that's required to update Coreboot firmware.

  [Security]
  No CVE's, but due to the nature of the package security should review.

  [Quality Assurance]
  Package builds and runs easily

  [Dependencies]
  N/A

  [Standards Compliance]
  Complies with FHS, though the organization of files in the source package could be organized better.

  [Common blockers]
  flashrom does NOT have a test suite that runs at build time.
  flashrom does NOT have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest.

  [Maintenance]
  Actively maintained - https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom
  Packaging - https://salsa.debian.org/myczko-guest/flashrom.git

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/+subscriptions