[Bug 1879481] Autopkgtest regression report (gcc-9/9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04)
Ubuntu SRU Bot
1879481 at bugs.launchpad.net
Fri Sep 4 17:26:11 UTC 2020
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted gcc-9 (9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
doxygen/1.8.17-0ubuntu2 (i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#gcc-9
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to gcc-10 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879481
Title:
update gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages for focal
Status in gcc-10 package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in gcc-9 package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in gcc-10 source package in Focal:
Fix Committed
Status in gcc-9 source package in Focal:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to
update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.2.0
release.
- gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.2.0 release
- gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time
of the gcc-10 release.
- corresponding gcc-cross packages
The package builds are prepared in
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
[Impact]
Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.2, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch
[Regression Potential]
There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found.
[Test Case]
No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test
rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures)
As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no
regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also
contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3
-stdlib-extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with
each other.
[Validation]
Analyze the build logs for regressions.
For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using
the updated sources.
Summary of the test rebuilds:
https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html
https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html
The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild
with the updated components.
There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which is
unrelated to the GCC update, and which was fixed by a separate SRU.
Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, and are not
checked for any regressions.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/+bug/1879481/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list