[Bug 1877769] Re: [SRU] Rewinding cache triggers obsolete adjustments consuming a lot of CPU
Balint Reczey
1877769 at bugs.launchpad.net
Fri Jul 31 17:06:14 UTC 2020
Verified 2.3ubuntu0.1 on Focal:
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac
/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/u/unattended-
upgrades/20200722_172955_59a0f@/log.gz :
...
Running ./test_rewind.py with python3
INFO:root:Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=lucid-security
INFO:root:Initial blacklist: ant-doc
INFO:root:Initial whitelist (not strict):
DEBUG:root:Marking not allowed <apt_pkg.PackageFile object: filename:'/tmp/autopkgtest.QeV87E/build.hoM/src/test/root.rewind/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages' a=lucid-updates,c=main,v=10.04,o=Ubuntu,l=Ubuntu arch='amd64' site='archive.ubuntu.com' IndexType='Debian Package Index' Size=894 ID:0> with -32768 pin
DEBUG:root:Applying pinning: PkgFilePin(id=0, priority=-32768)
DEBUG:root:Applying pin -32768 to package_file: <apt_pkg.PackageFile object: filename:'/tmp/autopkgtest.QeV87E/build.hoM/src/test/root.rewind/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages' a=lucid-updates,c=main,v=10.04,o=Ubuntu,l=Ubuntu arch='amd64' site='archive.ubuntu.com' IndexType='Debian Package Index' Size=894 ID:0>
DEBUG:root:APT::VersionedKernelPackages is not set
DEBUG:root:adjusting candidate version: test-package=2.0
DEBUG:root:adjusting candidate version: test2-package=2.0
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test2-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting z-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:sanity check failed for: set() : no package is selected to be upgraded or installed
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.063s
OK
...
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877769
Title:
[SRU] Rewinding cache triggers obsolete adjustments consuming a lot of
CPU
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Focal:
Fix Committed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Debian:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Impact]
* Unattended-upgrades consumes excessive amount of CPU when rewinding
cache trying to mark packages to upgrade or install even when they are
already marked to be upgraded or installed. This can be triggered by
packages held back.
[Test Case]
* Run test_rewind.py:
-Fixed output:
$ python3 test_rewind.py
INFO:root:Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=lucid-security
INFO:root:Initial blacklist: ant-doc
INFO:root:Initial whitelist (not strict):
DEBUG:root:Marking not allowed <apt_pkg.PackageFile object: filename:'/home/rbalint/projects/deb/unattended-upgrades/test/root.rewind/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages' a=lucid-updates,c=main,v=10.04,o=Ubuntu,l=Ubuntu arch='amd64' site='archive.ubuntu.com' IndexType='Debian Package Index' Size=894 ID:0> with -32768 pin
DEBUG:root:Applying pinning: PkgFilePin(id=0, priority=-32768)
DEBUG:root:Applying pin -32768 to package_file: <apt_pkg.PackageFile object: filename:'/home/rbalint/projects/deb/unattended-upgrades/test/root.rewind/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages' a=lucid-updates,c=main,v=10.04,o=Ubuntu,l=Ubuntu arch='amd64' site='archive.ubuntu.com' IndexType='Debian Package Index' Size=894 ID:0>
DEBUG:root:Applying pinning: PkgPin(pkg='/^ant-doc/', priority=-32768)
DEBUG:root:APT::VersionedKernelPackages is not set
DEBUG:root:adjusting candidate version: test-package=2.0
DEBUG:root:adjusting candidate version: test2-package=2.0
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test2-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting z-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:sanity check failed for: set() : no package is selected to be upgraded or installed
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.022s
OK
- Not fixed output:
$ python3 test_rewind.py
INFO:root:Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=lucid-security
INFO:root:Initial blacklist: ant-doc
INFO:root:Initial whitelist (not strict):
DEBUG:root:Marking not allowed <apt_pkg.PackageFile object: filename:'/home/rbalint/projects/deb/unattended-upgrades/test/root.rewind/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages' a=lucid-updates,c=main,v=10.04,o=Ubuntu,l=Ubuntu arch='amd64' site='archive.ubuntu.com' IndexType='Debian Package Index' Size=894 ID:0> with -32768 pin
DEBUG:root:Applying pinning: PkgFilePin(id=0, priority=-32768)
DEBUG:root:Applying pin -32768 to package_file: <apt_pkg.PackageFile object: filename:'/home/rbalint/projects/deb/unattended-upgrades/test/root.rewind/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages' a=lucid-updates,c=main,v=10.04,o=Ubuntu,l=Ubuntu arch='amd64' site='archive.ubuntu.com' IndexType='Debian Package Index' Size=894 ID:0>
DEBUG:root:Applying pinning: PkgPin(pkg='/^ant-doc/', priority=-32768)
DEBUG:root:APT::VersionedKernelPackages is not set
DEBUG:root:adjusting candidate version: test-package=2.0
DEBUG:root:adjusting candidate version: test2-package=2.0
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test2-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting z-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:sanity check failed for: set() : no package is selected to be upgraded or installed
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test2-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test3-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test2-package's dependencies
DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting test3-package's dependencies
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.024s
(Note the extra "DEBUG:root:falling back to adjusting" ... lines)
[Regression Potential]
* Minimal. The very small change fixes how call_checked() verifies that the package to be upgrades/installed is indeed marked to either being installed or upgraded.
In the worst case, if call_checked() erroneously returns success for a package as a result of a regression, unattended-upgrades does not fall back to adjusting packages to make marking successful. Later unattended-upgrades finds out that the package could not be marked and should be treated as kept back.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1877769/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list