[Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
1889297 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Jul 28 22:55:53 UTC 2020
Apparenlty the systemd package in the upload queue will be reviewed.
For my test packages, @ddstreet told me that a pure no-change rebuild
of systemd would FTBFS on arm64 due to bug #1886197.
So I added that patch to this systemd "almost no-change rebuild" patch.
** Patch removed: "lp1889297_bionic_systemd.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1889297/+attachment/5396664/+files/lp1889297_bionic_systemd.debdiff
** Patch added: "lp1889297_bionic_systemd-with-arm64-ftbfs.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1889297/+attachment/5396754/+files/lp1889297_bionic_systemd-with-arm64-ftbfs.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889297
Title:
Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2
not libkmod2-udeb
Status in kmod package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in kmod source package in Bionic:
In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
In Progress
Bug description:
[Impact]
* debian-installer currently FTBFS on Bionic because
udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not on libkmod2-udeb.
* This regression has been introduced in kmod 24-1ubuntu3.3,
and it propagated into udev-udeb in systemd 237-3ubuntu10.40.
* See the '[Details]' section for the details. :)
[Fix]
* That kmod change fixes a FTBFS with newer debhelper on Eoan and later,
but it is not required with older debhelper on Bionic. Just revert it.
* There is no need to "fix" this in Eoan and later (debhelper >= 12.3)
* No-change rebuild of systemd (for udev-udeb to pick up libkmod2-udeb.)
[Test Case]
* Try to build debian-installer on Bionic; it FTBFS:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
udev-udeb : Depends: libkmod2 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
* Check if libkmod2's shlibs file contains an udeb line:
$ dpkg-deb --control libkmod2_<version>_<arch>.deb dir
$ cat dir/shlibs
libkmod 2 libkmod2
udeb: libkmod 2 libkmod2-udeb # this is good.
[Regression Potential]
* The fix only changes the libkmod2's shlibs file to include
an udeb line (so udebs that depend on that library package
should depend on the -udeb package.)
Thus the regression potential is limited to the installer,
and the udeb packages which depend on libkmod2 (udev-udeb
only, probably.)
Regressions could be seen as failures to load libkmod2.so
and/or not finding its dynamic symbols.
* There is a no-change rebuild of systemd involved/required,
so some dependency updates may potentially impact systemd.
[Details]
debian-installer currently FTBFS on Bionic because
udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not on libkmod2-udeb:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
udev-udeb : Depends: libkmod2 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
This regression has been introduced in kmod 24-1ubuntu3.3,
and it propagated into udev-udeb in systemd 237-3ubuntu10.40.
kmod (24-1ubuntu3.3) bionic; urgency=medium
<...>
* Removed --add-udeb from dh_makeshlibs, since libkmod2-udeb does not
actually contain a library. (Closes: #939779)
<...>
From dh_makeshlibs(1):
--add-udeb=udeb
Create an additional line for udebs in the shlibs file
and use udeb as the package name for udebs to depend on
instead of the regular library package.
Before:
$ dpkg-deb --control libkmod2_24-1ubuntu3.2_amd64.deb
libkmod2-u32-control
$ cat libkmod2-u32-control/shlibs
libkmod 2 libkmod2
udeb: libkmod 2 libkmod2-udeb
$ dpkg-deb --info udev-udeb_237-3ubuntu10.39_amd64.udeb | grep Depends:
Depends: ..., libkmod2-udeb, ...
After:
$ dpkg-deb --control libkmod2_24-1ubuntu3.3_amd64.deb
libkmod2-u33-control
$ cat libkmod2-u33-control/shlibs
libkmod 2 libkmod2
$ dpkg-deb --info udev-udeb_237-3ubuntu10.40_amd64.udeb | grep Depends:
Depends: ..., libkmod2, ...
That kmod change fixes a FTBFS with newer debhelper on Eoan and later,
but it is not required with older debhelper on Bionic:
Eoan:
$ dpkg -s debhelper | grep Version:
Version: 12.6.1ubuntu2
$ dpkg-buildpackpage
<...>
dh_makeshlibs --add-udeb=libkmod2-udeb -- -c4
dh_makeshlibs: The udeb libkmod2-udeb does not contain any shared libraries but --add-udeb=libkmod2-udeb was passed!?
make: *** [debian/rules:120: .stamp-binary] Error 255
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2
Bionic:
$ dpkg -s debhelper | grep Version:
Version: 11.1.6ubuntu2
$ dpkg-buildpackpage
<...>
dh_makeshlibs --add-udeb=libkmod2-udeb -- -c4
dh_shlibdeps -- --warnings=7
<...>
dpkg-buildpackage: info: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included)
There is no need to "fix" this in Eoan and later, as debhelper >= 12.3
has support for udeb auto-detection in dh_makeshlibs(1) -- and the udeb
line is added to shlibs by default (without --add-udeb):
From dh_makeshlibs(1):
Since debhelper 12.3, dh_makeshlibs will by default add an additional udeb line for udebs
in the shlibs file, when the udeb has the same name as the deb followed by a "-udeb" suffix
<...>
Please use the --add-udeb and --no-add-udeb options below when this auto-detection is insufficient.
$ dpkg-deb --control libkmod2_26-1ubuntu1.1_amd64.deb libkmod2-eoan-control
$ cat libkmod2-eoan-control/shlibs
libkmod 2 libkmod2
udeb: libkmod 2 libkmod2-udeb
$ dpkg-deb --control libkmod2_27-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb libkmod2-focal-control
$ cat libkmod2-focal-control/shlibs
libkmod 2 libkmod2 (>= 27)
udeb: libkmod 2 libkmod2-udeb (>= 27)
$ dpkg-deb --control libkmod2_27+20200310-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libkmod2-groovy-control
$ cat libkmod2-groovy-control/shlibs
libkmod 2 libkmod2 (>= 27+20200310)
udeb: libkmod 2 libkmod2-udeb (>= 27+20200310)
This also needs a no-change rebuild on systemd, after kmod is
built/available in archive.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmod/+bug/1889297/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list