[Bug 1845157] Re: runner/autopkgtest fails to setup env with binary packages moved to another packge, and different source/binary versions

[Matthias Klose]

On 25.09.19 02:39, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Since I assume that even if we *do* start building for mips arch, you
> don't want the binutils source package to build for it (you would want
> the binutils-mipsen package to build for it, right?),

No. src:binutils builds all the native packages, plus most of the cross 
packages. src:binutils-mipsen only builds some cross targets, some of them 
already built before. If src:binutils-mipsen is staying, then this should be the 
final packaging layout.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to autopkgtest in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845157

Title:
  runner/autopkgtest fails to setup env with binary packages moved to
  another packge, and different source/binary versions

Status in autopkgtest package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in autopkgtest package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  seen at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/binutils/eoan/amd64

  looks like a combination of:

  - binary packages now built from a different source package

  - source and binary package version different (here in
    binutils-mipsen).

  
  <doko> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/amd64/b/binutils/20190924_072646_1d504@/log.gz
  <doko> where does this comparison come from, dpkg --compare-versions 2.32.90.20190917-0ubuntu1 lt 4~c4ubuntu1 ? 
  <doko> E: Can not find version '4~c4ubuntu1' of package 'binutils'
  <doko> E: Unable to find a source package for binutils
  <doko> that's the version of the binutils-mipsen source package, not the binutils package
  <cjwatson> I don't speak autopkgtest very well, but just from grepping that looks like:
  <cjwatson> runner/autopkgtest:472:  dpkg --compare-versions "$ver" lt "$maxver" || maxver="$ver";
  <cjwatson> (from my clone of https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest)
  <doko> hmm, this looks too clever. some binary packages are now built from binutils-mipsen, and not from binutils anymore. wondering if we should just ignore these failures and see if things go green again once everything migrated?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/1845157/+subscriptions