[Bug 1756595] Re: disk space info inadvertently provides all installed snaps
Launchpad Bug Tracker
1756595 at bugs.launchpad.net
Thu Sep 12 12:13:46 UTC 2019
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.8.3
---------------
apt (1.8.3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Simon Körner ]
* http: Fix Host header in proxied https connections (LP: #1838771)
[ Brian Murray ]
* Do not include squashfs file systems in df output. (LP: #1756595)
apt (1.8.2) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Alwin Henseler ]
* Flip /: in documented default value of DPkg::Path (Closes: #917986)
[ TilmanK ]
* Fix typo in German manpage translation
[ Américo Monteiro ]
* Portuguese manpages translation update (Closes: #926614)
[ Jean-Pierre Giraud ]
* French manpages translation update (Closes: #929290)
[ Michael Zhivich ]
* methods: https: handle requests for TLS re-handshake (LP: #1829861)
[ Julian Andres Klode ]
* Unlock dpkg locks in reverse locking order (LP: #1829860)
-- Julian Andres Klode <juliank at ubuntu.com> Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:16:15
+0200
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Disco)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756595
Title:
disk space info inadvertently provides all installed snaps
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Disco:
Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Eoan:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Impact]
When apport is reporting a crash, it includes the output of the "df" utility, to list the free disk space information per mount point.
That output nowadays will inadvertently include all snaps that the
user may have installed, including their revision numbers.
Here is a simple df output:
andreas at nsn7:~$ df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 8119680 0 8119680 0% /dev
tmpfs 1630156 1828 1628328 1% /run
nsn7/ROOT/ubuntu 433084288 2500608 430583680 1% /
tmpfs 8150776 18888 8131888 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5120 4 5116 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 8150776 0 8150776 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
nsn7/var/log 430763136 179456 430583680 1% /var/log
nsn7/var/tmp 430583808 128 430583680 1% /var/tmp
/dev/sda2 1032088 160336 871752 16% /boot
/dev/sda1 523248 2720 520528 1% /boot/efi
nsn7/home 430651264 67584 430583680 1% /home
nsn7/var/cache 430653312 69632 430583680 1% /var/cache
nsn7/var/mail 430583808 128 430583680 1% /var/mail
nsn7/var/spool 430583808 128 430583680 1% /var/spool
tmpfs 1630152 16 1630136 1% /run/user/120
tmpfs 100 0 100 0% /var/lib/lxd/shmounts
tmpfs 100 0 100 0% /var/lib/lxd/devlxd
tmpfs 1630152 36 1630116 1% /run/user/1000
nsn7/lxd/containers/squid-ds216 431444096 860416 430583680 1% /var/lib/lxd/storage-pools/default/containers/squid-ds216
/dev/loop0 83712 83712 0 100% /snap/core/4206
/dev/loop1 102144 102144 0 100% /snap/git-ubuntu/402
You can see I have the core snap at revision 4206, and git-ubuntu at
revision 402.
There are already many bug reports in launchpad where one can see this
information.
Granted, the user can review it, refuse to send this data, etc. This
bug is about the unexpectedness of having that information in the disk
space data.
If the user sees a prompt like "Would you like to include disk free
space information in your report?", or "Would you like to include the
output of the df(1) command in your report?", that doesn't immediately
translate to "Would you like to include disk free space information
and a list of all installed snaps and their revision numbers in your
report?".
[Test case]
Do something that triggers the apport hook and make sure you don't see snaps in there.
For example, install xterm, then add exit 1 to the start of the prerm,
then run apt remove xterm, and investigate /var/crash/xterm.0.crash
after that (delete before running apt).
[Regression potential]
Fix consists of adding -x squashfs to df output, so might hide other non-snap squashfs images.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1756595/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list