[Bug 1712938] Re: error while loading shared libraries: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Launchpad Bug Tracker
1712938 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Oct 22 03:50:17 UTC 2019
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to glibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1712938
Title:
error while loading shared libraries: cannot open shared object file:
No such file or directory
Status in glibc package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
The runtime linker+loader /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 makes an incorrect check for a loadable shared library. Subroutine check_arm_attributes_hfabi() in file glibc/elf/dl-load.c currently looks only at the Elf(W)Shdr records of type SHT_ARM_ATTRIBUTES, and ignores Elf(W)Ehdr.e_flags. The result is that some shared libraries that do work correctly (in every respect) are refused loading with the message
<main_program_path>: error while loading shared libraries: <shared_library_name>: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
In particular, when a shared library has no Shdr records (.e_shnum == 0) then ld-linux-armhf refuses to load that library, even though e_flags indicates that everything is correct.
An ELF file has two sets of information for a module (main program or
shared library): the execution view, and the linking view. The
execution view is in Ehdr and Phdr, the linking view is in Ehdr and
Shdr. The design intent is that the static linker /bin/ld takes input
only from the linking view, and the runtime linker+loader ld-linux-
armhf takes input only from the execution view. Any use of Shdr
records by ld-linux-armhf is a violation of the design intent.
In this particular case, the relevant information in
SHT_ARM_ATTRIBUTES regarding the use of the floating-point ABI is
summarized in flag bits in .e_flags, namely the EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD
bit. So if there are no Shdr records, then the e_flags should be
consulted. (Actually all the code that delves into Shdr could
[should] be replaced by a simple check of e_flags; but keeping the
existing Shdr code then checking e_flags last is in some sense the
"smallest" fix.)
A patch which adds the check on e_flags is:
--- elf/dl-load.c.orig 2017-08-24 09:51:11.000000000 -0700
+++ elf/dl-load.c 2017-08-24 14:47:48.525189652 -0700
@@ -1628,6 +1628,8 @@
}
}
+ /* This one statement using e_flags could [should] replace EVERYTHING above! */
+ *is_hf = !!(ehdr->e_flags & EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD);
return 0;
}
[The problem in this bug report was discovered in
https://github.com/upx/upx/issues/116 .]
$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
Release: 16.04
$ apt-cache policy libc6:armhf
libc6:
Installed: 2.23-0ubuntu5
Candidate: 2.23-0ubuntu9
Version table:
2.23-0ubuntu9 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com xenial-updates/main armhf Packages
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com xenial-security/main armhf Packages
*** 2.23-0ubuntu5 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2.23-0ubuntu3 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com xenial/main armhf Packages
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libc6:armhf 2.23-0ubuntu5
Uname: Linux 4.4.38-v7+ armv7l
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5
Architecture: armhf
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Thu Aug 24 15:10:30 2017
Dependencies:
gcc-6-base 6.0.1-0ubuntu1
libc6 2.23-0ubuntu5
libgcc1 1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1
SourcePackage: glibc
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1712938/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list