[Bug 1840686] Re: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT
Ćukasz Zemczak
1840686 at bugs.launchpad.net
Mon Nov 4 14:45:14 UTC 2019
Hello Pat, or anyone else affected,
Accepted grub2 into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.23 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from
verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of
your testing we will not be able to proceed.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance for helping!
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to grub in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840686
Title:
Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT
Status in cloud-init:
Won't Fix
Status in grub package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in grub source package in Xenial:
In Progress
Bug description:
[Impact]
On Xenial images which use GPT instead of MBR to enable efi based
booting, there is an issue where after booting an instance that has a
disk size of 2049 GB or higher, we hang on the next subsequent boot
(Logs indicate it hanging on "Booting Hard Disk 0").
This is a problem in grub2 where the system would become unbootable
after ext* online resize if no resize_inode was created at ext* format
time.
[Test Case]
To reproduce:
1) Create an image with a disk size of 3072 GB using a serial that has
GPT:
gcloud compute instances create test-3072-xenial --image daily-
ubuntu-1604-xenial-v20190731 --image-project ubuntu-os-cloud-devel
--boot-disk-size 3072
2) Reboot the instance
The instance will hang on reboot and you cannot connect. If you go to
GCP console and select Logs > Serial port 1 (console), you will see
the boot process has stopped at "Booting Hard Disk 0".
I have built a test package, which is available here:
https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/lp1840686-test
If you do step 1) but do not reboot, and instead add the PPA, install
the new grub like so:
1) gcloud compute instances create test-3072-xenial --image daily-ubuntu-1604-xenial-v20190731 --image-project ubuntu-os-cloud-devel --boot-disk-size 3072
2) sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mruffell/lp1840686-test
3) sudo apt-get update
4) sudo apt remove grub-common grub-efi-amd64 grub-efi-amd64-bin grub-efi-amd64-signed grub-pc-bin grub2-common
5) sudo apt install grub-common grub-efi-amd64 grub-efi-amd64-bin grub-pc-bin grub2-common
6) sudo grub-install /dev/sda
7) sudo reboot
The instance will boot successfully and you will be able to connect.
Note, we must use "daily-ubuntu-1604-xenial-v20190731" as the image,
as it is enabled for GPT and efi. GCP was reverted back to MBR and
bios booting because of this bug, so the latest images will not
reproduce the problem.
[Regression Potential]
Grub is a core package and every care must be taken in order to not
introduce any regressions.
The commit is present in B, D, E and F, and is considered well tested
and widely adopted by the community.
The commit comes with its own testcase, to test the ext4_metabg fix.
The changes are localised to ext* based filesystems, although since
they are the most popular family of filesystems used by the community,
this does not reduce risk of breakage by much.
If a regression were to happen, a regression would have a large
impact, and in the worst case, can lead to unbootable systems and data
loss for users who are not technical enough to reinstall grub from a
working package inside the broken system chroot.
[Other Info]
In comment #4, Sultan identifies the fix as:
commit e20aa39ea4298011ba716087713cff26c6c52006
Author: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder at gmail.com>
Date: Mon Feb 16 20:53:26 2015 +0100
Subject: ext2: Support META_BG.
This commit is from upstream grub2, and can be found here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=e20aa39ea4298011ba716087713cff26c6c52006
Looking at when this was merged:
$ git describe --contains e20aa39ea4298011ba716087713cff26c6c52006
2.02-beta3~429
This commit is present in B, D, E and F, leaving X as the only version
needing an SRU.
The commit cleanly cherry picks to X, because the delta from
2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.22 to 2.02-beta3~429 is small.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1840686/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list