[Bug 1807448] Re: [SRU] Patch power9-001.diff breaks IFUNC on ELFv1

Launchpad Bug Tracker 1807448 at bugs.launchpad.net
Wed Feb 20 15:36:54 UTC 2019


This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.8

---------------
binutils (2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.8) xenial; urgency=medium

  * power9-001.diff: Drop this patch as it breaks IFUNC on ELFv1 (LP:
#1807448)

 -- Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu.com>  Fri, 07 Dec 2018 12:49:49 -0700

** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Xenial)
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1807448

Title:
  [SRU] Patch power9-001.diff breaks IFUNC on ELFv1

Status in binutils package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in binutils source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ SRU Justification ]
  As per comment #4 in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1655181 the undefined weak fix should not have been backported because it breaks IFUNC on ELFv1, and can't be fixed without a much larger backport from 2.27.  This patch breaks glibc builds on PPC64 ELFv1.

  See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20472

  I will be pushing this upload via the ubuntu-security-proposed PPA, as
  this regression also exists in security and if we ever want to do a
  glibc security update, we need the fix there as well.

  [ Test Case ]
  See that glibc now builds on powerpc in xenial, when it didn't with the previous version.

  [ Regression Potential ]
  We lived fine without this patch before, and will do again in the future.  Removing it fixes ELFv1 glibc builds (and presumably anything else that uses IFUNC), but should have no other obvious impact.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1807448/+subscriptions



More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list