[Bug 1795614] Re: packagekit frontend locking
Julian Andres Klode
1795614 at bugs.launchpad.net
Thu Oct 18 13:51:38 UTC 2018
Same on xenial (0.8.17-4ubuntu6~gcc5.4ubuntu1.4):
root at xxx:~# lslocks
COMMAND PID TYPE SIZE MODE M START END PATH
iscsid 396 POSIX 4B WRITE 0 0 0 /run/iscsid.pid
atd 390 POSIX 4B WRITE 0 0 0 /run/atd.pid
cron 392 FLOCK 4B WRITE 0 0 0 /run/crond.pid
dpkg 2729 POSIX 0B WRITE 0 0 0 /var/lib/dpkg/lock
packagekitd 2653 POSIX 0B WRITE 0 0 0 /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend
packagekitd 2653 POSIX 0B WRITE 0 0 0 /var/cache/apt/archives/lock
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795614
Title:
packagekit frontend locking
Status in packagekit package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in packagekit source package in Xenial:
Fix Committed
Status in packagekit source package in Bionic:
Fix Committed
Status in packagekit source package in Cosmic:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[SRU Notes]
[rbasak] Requires apt 1.2.28 (Xenial) and 1.6.5 (Bionic), both of
which are currently in proposed. Do not release to updates without
releasing the newer apt first.
[Impact]
PackageKit needs an adjustment for frontend locking, so it does not release the frontend lock during dpkg invocations, but only the normal dpkg lock.
Frontend locking prevents race conditions between multiple dpkg
frontends, which can cause other frontends to be interrupted while
they are installing stuff - the frontend loses the dpkg lock between
dpkg runs and the system ends up in a partially configured state.
See bug 1781169 for more details on frontend locking.
[Test case]
1. Install a package
2. Modify prerm to sleep
3. Remove package via pkcon and check that packagekitd process holds lock-frontend and dpkg holds lock (we release lock by closing the lock files, so just check if the files are open).
[Regression potential]
Changing the code to call UnLockInner() vs UnLock() makes it do less steps and only release "lock" as before, and not "lock-frontend". That should not be causing any regressions.
The patch also adds a call to LockInner() after the dpkg execution to
make it reacquire "lock", this could fail. It should not have much
impact however, as it only affects a single transaction AFAICT. It
does reduce the risk of some frontend not implementing frontend
locking from racing while we still hold the frontend lock, though.
[Other info]
This is part of a wider series of SRUs for frontend locking
- dpkg (bug 1796081)
- apt (bug 1781169)
- python-apt (bug 1795407)
- packagekit (bug 1795614)
- unattended-upgrades (bug 1789637)
- aptdaemon (no bug filed yet)
Further details about frontend locking can be found in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2017/01/msg00044.html
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1795614/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list