[Bug 1726695] Re: Routes are not correctly documented in man pages
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
mathieu.tl at gmail.com
Mon Feb 26 15:16:38 UTC 2018
** Also affects: nplan (Ubuntu Artful)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: nplan (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to nplan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726695
Title:
Routes are not correctly documented in man pages
Status in netplan:
Fix Committed
Status in nplan package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in nplan source package in Xenial:
New
Status in nplan source package in Artful:
New
Bug description:
The only reference to routes in the man page in the complex example at
the very bottom of the page.
It's presented as being a top level element and doesn't specify
interface. netplan generate will not compile this useage.
routes:
- to: 0.0.0.0/0
via: 11.0.0.1
metric: 3
Examining the source code, under doc/example-config, there is a demonstration of the correct routes configuration which is under and interface definition.
ethernets:
# opaque ID for physical interfaces, only referred to by other stanzas
id0:
match:
macaddress: 00:11:22:33:44:55
wakeonlan: true
dhcp4: true
addresses:
- 192.168.14.2/24
- 2001:1::1/64
gateway4: 192.168.14.1
gateway6: 2001:1::2
routes:
- to: 11.22.0.0/16
via: 192.168.14.3
metric: 100
nameservers:
search: [foo.local, bar.local]
addresses: [8.8.8.8]
Please update the man page and fill out a complete list of options
available for a route.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1726695/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list