[Bug 1540407] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

Ryan Harper 1540407 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Mar 1 20:04:11 UTC 2016


On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:00 AM, bugproxy <bugproxy at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> ------- Comment From thorsten.diehl at de.ibm.com 2016-03-01 03:58 EDT-------
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > As already promised, I will continue some long term tests (cable pull and
> > other path loosing scenarios) on a 4.4.0-8 system with
> > multipath-tools_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-4 and kpartx_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-4.
> > Results should be available by tomorrow.
>
> Results show, that this combination does not harm, instead it solves the
> subject problem, even after 100 cycles.
>
> Ryan, but it's up to you what you are going to integrate to fix this
> bug.
>

Thorsten,

Thanks for the thorough testing of the scenarios.  I'm currently examining
the changes
introduced into the newer Debian package and looking at which changes we'd
need
to fix this bug and also understand if a merge of the package makes more
sense.


Ryan


>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
> Server Team, which is a bug assignee.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540407
>
> Title:
>   multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1540407/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540407

Title:
  multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

Status in multipath-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Thorsten Diehl <thorsten.diehl at de.ibm.com> - 2016-02-01 08:57:28 ==
  # uname -a
  Linux s83lp31 4.4.0-1-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 21 22:19:04 UTC 2016 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux

  # dpkg -s multipath-tools|grep ^Version:
  Version: 0.5.0-7ubuntu9

  # cat /etc/multipath.conf
  defaults {
      default_features "1 queue_if_no_path"
      user_friendly_names yes
      path_grouping_policy multibus
      dev_loss_tmo 2147483647
      fast_io_fail_tmo 5
  }

  blacklist {
      devnode '*'
  }

  blacklist_exceptions {
      devnode "^sd[a-z]+"
  }

  ---------------------------------------
  On a z Systems LPAR with a single LUN, 2 zfcp devices, 2 storage ports, and the following multipath topology:

  mpatha (36005076304ffc3e80000000000003050) dm-0 IBM,2107900
  size=1.0G features='1 queue_if_no_path' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
  `-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=active
    |- 0:0:0:1079001136 sda 8:0  active ready running
    |- 0:0:1:1079001136 sdb 8:16 active ready running
    |- 1:0:0:1079001136 sdc 8:32 active ready running
    `- 1:0:1:1079001136 sdd 8:48 active ready running

  I observed the following:
  When I deconfigure one of the two zfcp devices (e.g. via chchp -c 0, or directly on the HMC), the multipathd removes the two paths via these devices from the pathgroup after 10 seconds. When the zfcp devices comes back, it runs through zfcp error recovery and is being set up properly, and also the mid layer objects are looking fine. However, the multipathd does not add them to the path group again.

  Expected behaviour: multipathd does not remove the paths from topology
  list, but holds them as "failed faulty offline" until dev_loss_tmo
  timout is reached (which is infinite here).

  I discussed this already with zfcp development, and it looks most
  likely as a problem with multipathd, rather than zfcp or mid-layer.

  Easy to reproduce: you need two zfcp devices, one LUN, and preferably
  two ports on the storage server (WWPNs). Configure LUN via 2 zfcp
  devices * 2 WWPNs = 4 paths.

  This can be also reproduced on a z/VM guest. Instead of configuing the
  CHPID off, just detach one zfcp device and re-attach it after 30....60
  seconds. Same problem.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1540407/+subscriptions



More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list