[Bug 1523627] Re: Powerpc-utils and powerpc-ibm-utils is confusing

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package powerpc-utils - 1.3.1-1

---------------
powerpc-utils (1.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release, update debian/copyright to GPL (LP: #1539542)
  * Rewrite debian/watch file to track upstream's move to github/nfont.
  * Update Standards-Version to 3.9.7 and tidy up our lintian warnings.
  * Utilize dh-autoreconf because upstream no longer ships ./configure.
  * 01_ipmitool_check.patch: Suggest package install in ipmitool check.
  * 02_systool_check.patch: Fix and ipmrove systool test (LP: #1529590)
  * debian/control: Suggest sysfsutils and ipmitool for the above bits.

 -- Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3.net>  Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:09:42 -0600

** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to powerpc-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523627

Title:
  Powerpc-utils and powerpc-ibm-utils is confusing

Status in powerpc-utils package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  On Ubuntu users for the ppc64el architecture, I always see they
  installing powerpc-utils when they want to install powerpc-ibm-utils.

  I want to start a discussion here on how to handle it. I am wondering
  if it still make sense to have both package..

  Other than that, I would like to have the powerpc-ibm-utils tool added
  in the default installation ISO for ppc64el. How should we proceed
  with it?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-utils/+bug/1523627/+subscriptions