[Bug 1429756] [NEW] FTBFS: test_job_process fails in majority of cases
Martin Pitt
martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Mon Mar 9 08:47:12 UTC 2015
Public bug reported:
As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-
adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on
ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting
not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting
wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027
at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start).
1..153
FAIL: test_job_process
Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on
both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps
blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed.
** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: New
** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu Vivid)
Importance: High
Status: New
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429756
Title:
FTBFS: test_job_process fails in majority of cases
Status in upstart package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in upstart source package in Vivid:
New
Bug description:
As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-
adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on
ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting
not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting
wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027
at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start).
1..153
FAIL: test_job_process
Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on
both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps
blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1429756/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list