[Bug 282638] Re: log_progress_msg overridden with empty function in /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh
Andrew
radamanf at gmail.com
Tue Jun 17 11:13:29 UTC 2014
14.04 this time it's directly in /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/50-ubuntu-
logging
about line 86
log_progress_msg () {
:
}
It's so difficult to fix Canonical ?? If you want to use your function
call it from there then why is this ":" in body ??? to track how many
users will complain about this and do some statistics? Who you are
working for?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to lsb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282638
Title:
log_progress_msg overridden with empty function in /etc/lsb-base-
logging.sh
Status in “lsb” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
Binary package hint: lsb-base
The functions in /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh override all the corresponding functions in /lib/lsb/init-functions.
In particular it override log_progress_msg with the following code:
===========
...
log_progress_msg () {
:
}
...
===========
There is really little surprise in the fact no output is given.
Is this behavior intended?
If so: why?
fixing this is rather trivial, bu I would like to understand the "why" before touching anything
If that's relevant:
===========
mauro at heimdall:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 8.04.1
Release: 8.04
mauro at heimdall:~$ apt-cache policy lsb-base
lsb-base:
Installato: 3.2-4ubuntu1
Candidato: 3.2-4ubuntu1
Tabella versione:
*** 3.2-4ubuntu1 0
500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
===========
UPDATE:
I changed my /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh to "fix" the problem (if any).
If someone is interested these are the diffs:
===========
mauro at heimdall:/etc$ diff -wu lsb-base-logging.sh-orig lsb-base-logging.sh
--- lsb-base-logging.sh-orig 2007-09-06 19:43:32.000000000 +0200
+++ lsb-base-logging.sh 2008-10-14 10:55:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
COLS=80
COL=73
fi
+ if [ -n "$2" ]; then #normal case
# We leave the cursor `hanging' about-to-wrap (see terminfo(5)
# xenl, which is approximately right). That way if the script
# prints anything then we will be on the next line and not
@@ -99,6 +100,13 @@
# asterisk ought to go.
printf " * $* "
+ unset DO_PROGRESS
+ else #prepare for log_progress_msg
+ printf " * $1"
+ $TPUT sc
+ printf " "
+ DO_PROGRESS='t'
+ fi
# Enough trailing spaces for ` [fail]' to fit in; if the message
# is too long it wraps here rather than later, which is what we
# want.
@@ -111,7 +119,24 @@
}
log_progress_msg () {
- :
+ if [ -n $DO_PROGRESS ]; then
+ $TPUT rc
+ printf " $*"
+ $TPUT sc
+ printf " "
+ $TPUT hpa `$EXPR $COLS - 1`
+ printf ' '
+ fi
+}
+
+log_progress_msg1 () {
+ if [ -n $DO_PROGRESS ]; then
+ $TPUT rc
+ printf " $*"
+ $TPUT el
+ $TPUT hpa `$EXPR $COLS - 1`
+ printf ' '
+ fi
}
log_end_msg () {
===========
They appear to work correctly at least within gnome-terminal and at the linux console.
TiA
ZioNemo
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/282638/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list