[Bug 1209493] Re: [FFe] libapache2-svn missing in saucy

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package subversion - 1.7.9-1+nmu6ubuntu1

---------------
subversion (1.7.9-1+nmu6ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low

  * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
    - Create pot file on build.
    - debian/rules: Manually create the doxygen output directory, otherwise
      we get weird build failures when running parallel builds.
    - Build a python-subversion-dbg package.
    - Build-depend on python-dbg.
    - Build-depend on default-jre-headless/-jdk.
    - only build on requested python versions (X-Python-Versions:)
    - Do not apply java-build patch.
    - Drop svn2cl to Suggests; we don't particularly need it in Ubuntu main
  * Includes changes from Debian nmu5 and nmu6 to restore the Apache module
    (LP: #1209493). Thanks to James McCoy for the Debian NMUs.
  * d/tests/libapache2-mod-svn: add dep8 test for Apache functionality.
 -- Robie Basak <robie.basak at ubuntu.com>   Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:35:59 +0000

** Changed in: subversion (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to subversion in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1209493

Title:
  [FFe] libapache2-svn missing in saucy

Status in “subversion” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “subversion” package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [FFe]

  libapache2-svn was dropped in Debian to unblock the Apache 2.4
  transition. This was an intentional regression.

  Patches have been in Debian BTS for a while, and a DD has now uploaded
  a delayed NMU for it. (The package is now libapache2-mod-svn).

  I'd like to cherry-pick this change for Saucy, but only if the NMU
  lands. The patch against the NMU notice in Debian BTS looks good. But
  since this involves a "new" binary package, I don't have visibility of
  the exact canonical patch yet. But I will make sure that what I
  cherry-pick only impacts the new binary package, and test it myself.

  Impact: we will completely regress the Subversion Apache module if we
  do not fix this. Regression risk: as long as we're only impacting the
  new binary package, I don't see that we can make the situation worse.
  I will need to check carefully that this will only impact the new
  binary package.

  [Original Description]

  The package does not exist in saucy - and  mod_dav_svn.so is not
  provided by any other package.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subversion/+bug/1209493/+subscriptions