[Bug 1066414] Re: cairo-5c ftbfs in quantal

[Steve Langasek]

This same build failure was reported in Debian unstable, before freetype
was revved.  So this isn't a freetype regression.  It still could be a
freetype bug at its root, but it looks more likely to be a toolchain
regression.

** Changed in: freetype (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to freetype in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066414

Title:
  cairo-5c ftbfs in quantal

Status in “cairo-5c” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in “freetype” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in “cairo-5c” package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  cairo ftbfs in quantal, failing some test cases. quantal and sid use
  the same cairo version, but the tests fail in quantal and succeed in
  sid.

  set-font              failed: pixel mismatch 0xe0000000 not similar to 0x0 at 22 10
  set-font-size         failed: pixel mismatch 0xf8000000 not similar to 0x0 at 56 12
  set-font-matrix       failed: pixel mismatch 0xf8000000 not similar to 0x0 at 6 22
  show-text             failed: pixel mismatch 0xe0000000 not similar to 0x0 at 27 10
  text-path             failed: pixel mismatch 0x5b000000 not similar to 0x44000000 at 53 16
  text-extents          failed: pixel mismatch 0xff1f1f1f not similar to 0xffffffff at 27 30
  font-extents          failed: font_extents returned wrong value: {ascent = 11, descent = 3, height = 14, max_x_advance = 16, max_y_advance = 0} != {ascent = 12, descent = 3, height = 14, max_x_advance = 16, max_y_advance = 0}

  all the test regressions are font related; sid has freetype 2.4.9,
  quantal 2.4.10, so either the test cases need adjustment, or this
  could be a regression in freetype.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo-5c/+bug/1066414/+subscriptions