[Bug 1216470] Re: ntfs-3g Raring package does not indicate that it provides ntfsprogs

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package partitionmanager - 1.0.3-0ubuntu7

---------------
partitionmanager (1.0.3-0ubuntu7) trusty; urgency=low

  * Suggest ntfs-3g, instead of ntfsprogs. (LP: #1216470)
 -- Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox at ubuntu.com>   Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:46:06 +0000

** Changed in: partitionmanager (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to gparted in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216470

Title:
  ntfs-3g Raring package does not indicate that it provides ntfsprogs

Status in “fai” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “fsarchiver” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in “gparted” package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in “ntfs-3g” package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in “partitionmanager” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “fai” source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in “fsarchiver” source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in “gparted” source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in “ntfs-3g” source package in Raring:
  Won't Fix
Status in “partitionmanager” source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in “fai” source package in Saucy:
  Invalid
Status in “fsarchiver” source package in Saucy:
  Invalid
Status in “gparted” source package in Saucy:
  Invalid
Status in “ntfs-3g” source package in Saucy:
  Won't Fix
Status in “partitionmanager” source package in Saucy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  When installing third-party packages that depend on ntfsprogs and
  support multiple Ubuntu versions, the dependency check fails on Raring
  Ringtail since the ntfs-3g package does not indicate it replaces
  ntfsprogs (source: aptitude show ntfs-3g).  I suspect this was
  overlooked in Raring as ntfsprogs was dropped (not provided) in
  Raring.  Unfortunately, some third-party packages will still address
  ntfsprogs for sometime and it would be helpful if ntfs-3g would
  satisfy the dependency.

  I have filed a bug with the third-party provider as well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fai/+bug/1216470/+subscriptions