[Bug 1074428] Re: ureadahead is not optimal

[D J Gardner]

I'm not convinced you should be starting fsck while loading stuff into
cache - that would surely be a conflict. Both are disk-intensive, after
all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to ureadahead in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074428

Title:
  ureadahead is not optimal

Status in “ureadahead” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This forum post:

  http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502

  Describes ureadahead as efficiently loading all boot files at once,
  resulting in a faster boot time, which is correct from the point of
  view of the I/O. However viewing a bootchart with ureadahead running
  shows that no other process is started while it's running and cpu
  utilization is close to zero.

  See attached picture which exemplifies this behavior.

  In the picture it's possible to see that first process executed after
  ureadahead is "mountall". However it's very probable that mountall was
  loaded somewhere in the middle of execution of ureadahead and could
  have been executed much earlier, resulting in both I/O and processing
  being used as efficiently as possible. The only possible reason for an
  optimal implementation to result in the above picture is when
  "mountall" is the last file that ureadahead loads, which I don't
  believe is the case.

  In the optimal situation, the remaining execution time of the whole
  boot process after ureadahead should be minimal, mostly dependent on
  the organization of the files on disk.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1074428/+subscriptions