[Bug 1096986] [NEW] Backport aarch64 support to stable releases for infratructure/buildd use
Adam Conrad
adconrad at 0c3.net
Mon Jan 7 18:48:20 UTC 2013
Public bug reported:
The lucid-cat dpkg already knows about arm64/aarch64 (I backported it a
while ago for use on infrastructure machines), however precise missed
out on this, and instead of building special internal versions of tools
with simple backports like this, it makes much more sense to SRU them to
the archive proper, so others doing the same things we are (ie: building
and hosting archives on LTS releases) can also benefit from these
backports.
Quantal's dpkg already supports arm64, and no one except Canonical (who
is already dealt with via the above lucid-cat backport) should really
care about armd64-on-lucid, so this backport will only be done to
precise.
** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Adam Conrad (adconrad)
Status: New
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Adam Conrad (adconrad)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to dpkg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096986
Title:
Backport aarch64 support to stable releases for infratructure/buildd
use
Status in “dpkg” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “dpkg” source package in Precise:
New
Bug description:
The lucid-cat dpkg already knows about arm64/aarch64 (I backported it
a while ago for use on infrastructure machines), however precise
missed out on this, and instead of building special internal versions
of tools with simple backports like this, it makes much more sense to
SRU them to the archive proper, so others doing the same things we are
(ie: building and hosting archives on LTS releases) can also benefit
from these backports.
Quantal's dpkg already supports arm64, and no one except Canonical
(who is already dealt with via the above lucid-cat backport) should
really care about armd64-on-lucid, so this backport will only be done
to precise.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1096986/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list