[Bug 1038468] Re: data loss on sort -u
Colin Watson
cjwatson at canonical.com
Mon Sep 10 12:23:18 UTC 2012
I have run the test case from the bug report on all of hardy, lucid,
natty, and oneiric (albeit in slightly stale chroots and only on i386)
and have confirmed that none of them suffer from this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038468
Title:
data loss on sort -u
Status in “coreutils” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in “coreutils” source package in Precise:
Confirmed
Status in “coreutils” source package in Quantal:
Confirmed
Status in “coreutils” package in Debian:
New
Bug description:
Last year a bug was reported to upstream coreutils [1] about problems
on using 'sort -u'. Until recently, there was no known reproducing
process; one such process was published last week [2].
Although triggering the bug can be said to be a non-completely trivial
use case, data loss in 'sort' should be looked at as a serious issue.
Today Jim Meyering committed what looks like the final touches of the
fix (incidentally also solving a different issue (a free memory read),
also in 'sort'. There are 4 commits affected, and they are shown
starting in [3].
Given this is a data loss potential, I am opening this bug for all
affected releases (this bug affects Coreutils 8.6 onwards -- Precise
and Quantal). I am still to run the tests on Lucid, Natty, and
Oneiric.
[1] http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9780
[2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-08/msg00027.html
[3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-08/msg00057.html
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1038468/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list