[Bug 1044156] Re: gpg key retrieval gives bogus, confusing error message

[Paul Abrahams]

I don't have a problem in resolving that hostname in any other context.
For instance:

pwa at pwa-K60IJ:~/Documents$ ping subkeys.pgp.net
PING subkeys.pgp.net (116.240.198.71) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from web-196-keysigning.ivt.com.au (116.240.198.71): icmp_req=1 ttl=46 time=255 ms
64 bytes from web-196-keysigning.ivt.com.au (116.240.198.71): icmp_req=2 ttl=46 time=254 ms

And I can bring up a page with the URL also.

So if there's an iptables/urw problem, it's very particular to this
context.  Others have also reported this problem, though most of them
have resolved it.  It seemed to be related to the use of a proxy server,
but I'm not using one. as System Settings verifies.

What log should I look at for further information?  It will be quite
difficult for anyone from the iptables world to track this down if it
only occurs in this one context.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to gnupg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044156

Title:
  gpg key retrieval gives bogus, confusing error message

Status in “gnupg” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I attempted to install a key using gpg as follows:

  pwa at pwa-K60IJ:~/Documents$ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys A8AA1FAA3F055C03
  gpg: requesting key 3F055C03 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
  ?: subkeys.pgp.net: Host not found
  gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Success
  gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
  gpg: Total number processed: 0

  I don't know why I got this error (I'm not behind a proxy server), but
  that's not the point of my filing this bug report.  Whatever the
  problem is, it's not a case of "host not found".   The host is there
  and I can link to it.  The error message is clearly bogus, and very
  misleading.  It needs to reflect what the problem really is.

  I'm running Kubuntu 12.04. and gpg 1.4.11.  The command cited above
  seems to work for most people, but it doesn't work for me.

  PS - I attempted to file this report under package gpg, but got a
  message that gpg does not exist in ubuntu.  Yet gpg shows up under the
  package name search in the bug reporter.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg/+bug/1044156/+subscriptions