[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error
Paul Crawford
1001189 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sun May 20 20:07:40 UTC 2012
If I run the accessdb command on the 32-bit 12.04 machine it core dumps:
$ /usr/sbin/accessdb /packages/local/share/man/index.db
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Doing the same on the 64-bit 10.04 machine produces something intelligible:
$ /usr/sbin/accessdb /packages/local/share/man/index.db
$mtime$ -> "1322648132"
$version$ -> "2.4.1"
Data::AMF::Type::NULL~3pm -> "- 3pm 3 1293669463 C Data::AMF::Type::Null - - "
Data::AMF::Type::Null~3pm -> "- 3pm 3 1293669463 A - - - "
NEdit~1 -> "- 1 1 1069626004 C nedit - - "
animate -> "- 1 1 1178029761 A - - - animates an image or image sequence on any X server."
any::moose -> "Any::Moose 3pm 3 1293668769 A - - - use Moose or Mouse modules"
appletviewer -> "- 1 1 1096427362 A - - - Java applet viewer"
attribute::params::validate -> "Attribute::Params::Validate 3pm 3 1293669227 A - - - Validate method/function parameters using attributes"
biosdecode -> "- 8 8 1172493847 A - - - BIOS information decoder"
bonnie++ -> "- 8 8 993754830 A - - - program to test hard drive performance."
As you suspected, the $version$ value is the same 2.4.1
But trying this on a 32-bit 10.04 machine (not normally with this file available) I get something vaguely familiar:
$ /usr/sbin/accessdb /packages/local/share/man/index.db
gdbm fatal: read error
So it seems the underlying issue is the database has no indication (or
handling) of 64-bit versus 32-bit data! That seems to me to be a
spectacularly dumb omission for anything that performs such an
aggressive search for index.db files, as I expect a lot of organisations
will have both 32-bit and 64-bit OS in use with networking as well :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to man-db in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001189
Title:
'man' command fails with lseek error
Status in “man-db” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
When trying to look up the on-line documentation using the 'man'
command it fails on 12.04 with lseek error. For example:
$ man resolvconf
gdbm fatal: lseek error
This lseek error applies to other requests as well (e.g. ls, fdisk,
etc). System information is:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release: 12.04
apt-cache policy man
man:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
However, it is installed since it runs as a command, and I find:
$ which man
/usr/bin/man
$ man --version
man 2.6.1
What I expect is to read the manual page appropriate to the
command/program, and not get a software error.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1001189/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list