[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before
Scott Moser
smoser at ubuntu.com
Tue Mar 27 15:41:33 UTC 2012
Just a reference, I've seen something similar at bug 963420, but my
initial tests have not shown significant difference in i386 compared to
amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230
Title:
openssl on 64bit is much slower than before
Status in “openssl” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Posting output of openssl speed on precise alpha and 10.04. Some quick
googling seems to indicate issues with 64bit asm vs. the C version
(might be a good idea to disable 64bit asm). This is on a processor
without AES-NI (which is still very common).
Precise:
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128 cbc 61725.52k 67902.33k 69264.13k 146084.86k 148518.23k
aes-192 cbc 52222.95k 56592.77k 57542.04k 122330.11k 125277.32k
aes-256 cbc 44912.70k 48644.01k 49539.94k 105978.88k 107372.74k
Lucid:
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128 cbc 74876.87k 118355.41k 138862.76k 144140.50k 141562.78k
aes-192 cbc 82093.08k 110813.18k 120764.33k 118315.44k 118527.32k
aes-256 cbc 74760.65k 96842.01k 104520.45k 106615.81k 103481.34k
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: openssl 1.0.0g-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-12.21-generic 3.2.2
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-12-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Feb 24 02:33:44 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120201.1)
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm-256color
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: openssl
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list