[Bug 965662] Re: pam-auth-update conflict resolution shouldn't warn

Steve Langasek steve.langasek at canonical.com
Mon Mar 26 21:28:03 UTC 2012


On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:59:44PM -0000, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> As documented, the resolution mechanism compares priorities on the
> affected modules to determine which one to use in case of a conflict.
> That's what guarantees the result is what you want, or at least what the
> package maintainers wanted the default behavior to be when those modules
> were selected together.

No, not at all.  Priority refers to the *ordering* of modules in the stack,
it does not refer to which one should be *preferred* in the case of
conflicts.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965662

Title:
  pam-auth-update conflict resolution shouldn't warn

Status in “pam” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  After automatically resolving conflicts in pam-config stubs, pam-auth-
  update will still pop up a warning notification that requires the user
  to select [Ok].

  Requiring user interaction kind of defeats the purpose of having the
  automatic Conflicts and Priority conflict-resolution mechanism, and
  the priority-"high" warning box for presenting non-essential
  information is itself arguably a policy violation.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/965662/+subscriptions




More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list