[Bug 771372] Re: procps runs too early in the boot process

Clint Byrum clint at fewbar.com
Fri Mar 9 18:23:07 UTC 2012


Excerpts from Peter Matulis's message of Fri Mar 09 12:50:44 UTC 2012:
> Clint, isn't this tag sufficient to get out the fix for Lucid:
> 
> verification-done-lucid
> 

No, that tag is used for informational purposes only.

In the pending-sru report here:

http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html

The only way we're going to see that it is ready for release is that the
bugs for a package are all green or purple. Green means verification-done,
purple means verification-done *and* verification-needed, usually caused
by verification only being done in one of the releases.

We don't want to make the release-specific tags the way to get it
released, because we have to consider the impact of having it fixed in
one release, and not in the next, so purple is a signal to us on that
report that we need to think carefully about whether or not to release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771372

Title:
  procps runs too early in the boot process

Status in “procps” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “procps” source package in Lucid:
  Fix Committed
Status in “procps” source package in Maverick:
  Fix Committed
Status in “procps” source package in Natty:
  Fix Committed
Status in “procps” source package in Oneiric:
  Fix Committed
Status in “procps” source package in Precise:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: upstart

  The start on criteria is for procps.conf is:
  start on virtual-filesystems

  This runs before some kernel modules are loaded, and procps applies
  the settings before they "exist", this is most noticed with network
  and network-related jobs (nfs, bridge).

  This bug may be considered a duplicate of LP Bug #690433.  I am
  opening a new one anyway, however because I think it's worth
  considering a more robust solution that would work for any possible
  kernel module.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/771372/+subscriptions




More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list