[Bug 1020833] [NEW] the filename /var/dpkg/info/e2fslibs.list does not match

William 1020833 at bugs.launchpad.net
Wed Jul 4 06:37:26 UTC 2012


Public bug reported:

Wile investigating package information i found that i have about 400
packages wich do not have the correct
/var/lib/dpkg/info/packagename.list. (and md5sums file)

Is there a specific reason for not naming the list file as the
packagename as shown by dpkg -l, but instead e.g. creating
/varlib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:amd64.list?

This does not seem consistent.

I would expect that the packagename should be e2flibs:amd64 wich has a
corresponding /var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:amd64.list or on i386
e2fslibs:i386 with the corresponding name
/var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:i386.list

Regards,

William van de Velde

** Affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Description changed:

  Wile investigating package information i found that i have about 400
  packages wich do not have the correct
- /var/lib/dpkg/info/packagename.list.
+ /var/lib/dpkg/info/packagename.list. (and md5sums file)
  
  Is there a specific reason for not naming the list file as the
  packagename as shown by dpkg -l, but instead e.g. creating
  /varlib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:amd64.list?
  
  This does not seem consistent.
  
  I would expect that the packagename should be e2flibs:amd64 wich has a
  corresponding /var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:amd64.list or on i386
  e2fslibs:i386 with the corresponding name
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:i386.list
  
  Regards,
  
  William van de Velde

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020833

Title:
  the filename /var/dpkg/info/e2fslibs.list does not match

Status in “e2fsprogs” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Wile investigating package information i found that i have about 400
  packages wich do not have the correct
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/packagename.list. (and md5sums file)

  Is there a specific reason for not naming the list file as the
  packagename as shown by dpkg -l, but instead e.g. creating
  /varlib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:amd64.list?

  This does not seem consistent.

  I would expect that the packagename should be e2flibs:amd64 wich has a
  corresponding /var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:amd64.list or on i386
  e2fslibs:i386 with the corresponding name
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fslibs:i386.list

  Regards,

  William van de Velde

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1020833/+subscriptions




More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list