[Bug 876298] Re: [MASTER] We need to better handle external payloads (Flash, msttcorefonts) not being available.
Barry Warsaw
876298 at bugs.launchpad.net
Wed Feb 8 19:41:08 UTC 2012
One thought, which I'm sure is horrible. u-m could have a list of
packages in its conf file which contain external payloads, and if one of
these packages fails to install, it could essentially ignore that (with
a warning, dialog, or setting to control this) and continue on with the
installation. It would be kind of automatically retried the next time
u-m ran since it would still see that package as needing installation.
Not sure what would happen if the failed-to-install package had
dependencies though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to ubiquity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876298
Title:
[MASTER] We need to better handle external payloads (Flash,
msttcorefonts) not being available.
Status in “ubiquity” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “update-manager” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
At the 11.10 release archive.canonical.com collapsed under heavy load
and started returning 503 errors. This caused the flash package to be
unable to grab its payload and thus caused the package to fail, which
in turn caused the installation to fail.
The current plan is to add metadata to a package where it can add a
URL to retrieve its data, so ubiquity and apt-get --download-only can
cache it. We also need a way to queue up package installation post-
install, for when we commit to installing flash but cannot do so due
to network issues, or when the user wishes to have full language
support post-install.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/876298/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list