[Bug 838975] Re: weird pthread/fork race/deadlock
Colin Watson
cjwatson at canonical.com
Mon Sep 26 10:21:31 UTC 2011
** Also affects: eglibc (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations)
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-11.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838975
Title:
weird pthread/fork race/deadlock
Status in “eglibc” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Status in “eglibc” source package in Oneiric:
Triaged
Status in “glibc” package in Fedora:
Unknown
Bug description:
There appears to be a strange bug in glibc that causes deadlocks when
calling fork() from threads. We had a testcase in GLib failing from
time to time because of this.
I've attached a minimal testcase that uses only pure pthreads + libc.
Compile it with -pthread and run it. It should fill your screen with
dots for a while, then hang when it hits the bug (which happens
randomly anywhere between 1 dot and hundreds). I've already received
independent verification that this testcase hangs on several people's
computers.
I believe this to be an upstream issue since this bug is visible on
Fedora 15 and 16, but the glibc website says I should file bugs
against distributions first. I also believe the issue to be a
regression since Lucid is fine but Oneiric is not. The problem
appears to affect both 32 and 64bits.
Some notes:
- compiling the testcase with -static has the side-effect of causing
the bug to go away
- compiling the testcase with -DFORK_DIRECTLY also appears to solve
the problem
- replacing the execv() with a direct exit(0) doesn't solve the
problem but causes the frequency to change
The fact that both static linking and making the fork() syscall directly cause the problem to disappear leads me to believe that this is a libc bug rather than a kernel bug (which is the only other possibility). I'm not 100% sure of that, though, since libc actually uses the clone() syscall to implement fork(), so there could be a different inside the kernel because of that.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/838975/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list