[Bug 857662] Re: Should xenbus_probe_frontend be built-in?

Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
Fri Sep 23 19:23:24 UTC 2011


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to hw-detect in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857662

Title:
  Should xenbus_probe_frontend be built-in?

Status in “hw-detect” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in “hw-detect” source package in Natty:
  Triaged
Status in “linux” source package in Natty:
  Confirmed
Status in “hw-detect” source package in Oneiric:
  Triaged
Status in “linux” source package in Oneiric:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  xenbus_probe_frontend is currently modular in several flavours,
  notably in the i386/generic-pae and amd64/generic flavours which we
  use to build d-i Xen netboot images.  The purpose of
  xenbus_probe_frontend appears to be to connect to the Xen bus and then
  emit uevents for any devices it finds there.  Once it's loaded,
  autoloading for such things as xen-netfront works fine, allowing the
  guest to find its network interface.  I believe that xen-blkfront
  works in a similar way.

  However, with xenbus_probe_frontend modular, the early stages of the
  installer plus the early stages of normal system boot need to load
  xenbus_probe_frontend in order to find block and network devices.  If
  we're going to do this, it seems as though we might as well just build
  xenbus_probe_frontend into the kernel.  It seems to me that it should
  be pretty harmless on non-Xen systems, although of course somebody
  knowledgeable should verify that.

  Right now, it's built in for the -virtual flavours, but we aren't
  currently building installer images from that, and I think I'm happier
  building them directly from -generic-pae / -generic anyway.

  This is true in both Natty and Oneiric.  If you can't do this for
  Oneiric and/or are unwilling to do this in a stable update for Natty,
  then please let me know so that I can add a workaround to the
  installer in time.  Thanks!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hw-detect/+bug/857662/+subscriptions




More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list