[Bug 69531] Re: ImageMagick Font Issues

[Brian Murray]

According to the Debian bug report this is fixed in version 7:6.5.9.8-1
which is included in Ubuntu since Maverick.  Subsequently I am setting
this to Fix Released.

** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

** Tags added: udd-find

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to imagemagick in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69531

Title:
  ImageMagick Font Issues

Status in “imagemagick” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in Debian GNU/Linux:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: libmagick9

  Regarding one of our web servers, a co-worker of mine filed an internal
  bug with this text:

  > ImageMagick fonts don't get properly configured -- this seems like it
  > may be a package bug to me, though I'm not sure.
  > Basically /usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.2.4/config/type.xml, as installed,
  > refers to type-ghostscript.xml, which refers to fonts that are not
  > installed (we don't have any Type 1 fonts installed). The ImageMagick
  > examples page ( http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~anthony/graphics/imagick6/ )
  > suggests using a script to enumerate fonts:
  > http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~anthony/graphics/imagick6/scripts/imagick_type_gen (this produces a replacement for type.xml). I did that and it seems to work fine. The proper way would probably involve having every installed font package add a file to be included in type.xml. (Well, ideally, there would be a type.d directory, I suppose :) )

  Our needing to edit a configuration file which is stored
  in /usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.2.4/config makes me nervous. It's going to get
  overwritten on upgrades, since it's not a conffile, right?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/69531/+subscriptions