ace at suares.an
Sat Sep 12 09:16:46 UTC 2009
Thanks for your mail!
> it doesnt take a week to show up at http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/
> the advantage is that votes and actions are specifically handled and
> that the bot only logs between the "startmeeting" and "endmeeting"
> commands ... so its way easier to read the log ...
It's easier to read, but just as easy as to look up the time in the
irclogs and link to that specific minute. IF you want to take a look at
the last Meeting Log
THEN you will find a link to the raw log that starts exactly when the
meeting began ENDIF
Cons for using mootbot - someone has to not forget to say startmeeting
and endmeeting. I someone remembers after some time, then a part of the
meeting is not logged.
Pro's for using mootbot - voting registration, clear topics if there is
an ageanda, easy summarizing
Con: - someone has to have the discipline to use mootbot very concisely.
- someone needs to be chair. - backup chair is needed too.
Who wants to be chair of the next edubuntu meeting!?
Pro: - summarizing a meeting without mootbot is hell. - summarizing a
meeting without agenda, clear goals, chair, internal discussion
discipline is quadruple hell.
I don't think I will do a lot of summarizing in the near future. Maybe
the raw logs is just what we need from the meetings.... I don't know. It
seems that people got by in the majority of the past with just the raw logs.
> if you have specific questions, just ping Seeker in #ubuntu-scribes
I'm on it :-)
More information about the edubuntu-devel