list of removal candidates

[Arne Hestad]

Looks ok to me

Thank You,
Kris Hestad, MCP
Sr. Computer Specialist
Faculty Center 
University Of Central Florida 
4000 Central Florida Blvd. 
CL1-207
Orlando, FL 32816-0066
407-823-3544
www.fctl.ucf.edu


>>> Oliver Grawert <ogra at ubuntu.com> 12/7/2009 8:53 AM >>>
hi,
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 13:53 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Hi,
> 
> The following source packages:
> - are in universe or multiverse
> - are not in Debian unstable
> - have not been updated in Ubuntu since Ubuntu hardy (=> same version in
>   hardy and lucid)
> - are installed on less than 0.1% of Ubuntu systems, according to popcon
>   (=> popcon < 1400 installations)
> 
> I have gone through each of them, and I think that they are good
> candidates for removal from Ubuntu. Could you please go through the
> list, and try to find packages that should be kept for some reason?

> # packages that were apparently never part of Debian (at least they
> # weren't in etch or lenny)
...
> sugar-sliderpuzzle-activity
> sugar-flipsticks-activity
> sugar-jigsawpuzzle-activity
...
> squeak-plugin-image
> squeak-sources3
...
> sugar-logviewer-activity
...
> sugar-connect-activity
...
> sugar-memorize-activity

for these packages the edubuntu people used to care, i think the squeak
packages come from a time where debian refused to include squeak at all
due to its licensing (i think this changed ...)
and the sugar components come from a disagreement between the ubuntu and
debian sugar teams, i'm cross-sending this to edubuntu-devel so the
edubuntu team can take a look ...

ciao
oli