Does Open Source make life easy????
Jim Kronebusch
jim at winonacotter.org
Wed Nov 14 22:12:45 UTC 2007
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:28:44 +1030, Karl Goetz wrote
> On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 10:41 -0500, Jim Kronebusch wrote:
> > Does anyone think local installs of Knoppix or Damn Small Linux running from a local HD
> > or flash drive in these laptops would be a good suggestion? Something like this would
> > loose some eye-candy but should run great with the stated hardware. Then the wireless
> > could be used for Internet Access, Central Auth (LDAP), and possibly NFS homes such as
>
> 54mb router.
> 20 clients
> =
> 3mb each.
> I'm not sure i can agree running NFS homes over 3mb wireless is a good
> idea tbh.
I'm also a little iffy on NFS over wireless, but I don't know what the options are. I
personally would stick with local storage in that case. Or maybe configure the storage
to be the users USB sticks. Many of these tiny distros allow your profile and /home to
be stored on portable media....just a thought.
> > Gavin suggested. There are many solutions for mass cloning that I'm sure could be
> > figured out fairly quick.
>
> The ongoing maintainace is the real kicker.
I think this will be a kicker with anything, Windows, Mac, Linux, etc. The only thing
that could simplify would be Diskless remote booting or thin clients. But I'm not a fan
of wireless, let alone trying to run either of those over wireless. A good central
imaging system is likely the best way to solve this. You hosed your machine, boot from
rescue disk or similar, restore image.
> >
> > If you wanted to stick with an Ubuntu derivative I'd definitely stick with Xubuntu.
> > This will run much better with a local install than Ubuntu or Kubuntu. The window
> > manager is largely what limits your hardware. I've ran Xubuntu on an 800Mhz PIII with
> > 256RAM and it performed fairly well. I too would not suggest trying to run any type of
> > LTSP over wireless, you'll end up writing another letter of frustration :-)
>
> I have to agree with the LTSP over wireless comments - try not to(!).
> kk
>
> >
> > Jim
Again, these are all options, something you don't have with the alternative OS's.
I wonder how OLPC and the Intel guys plan maintenance on their 1 to 1 implementations?
I'll bet they have some creative ideas/solutions that could be applied to this type of
situation. Local restore partition?
Jim
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cotter Technology
Department, and is believed to be clean.
More information about the edubuntu-devel
mailing list