DMB: proposal for adjustment to quorum rule

[Robie Basak]

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:08:22PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > Here's a guideline suggestion that may help for as long as we have
> > realtime meetings: if there hasn't been time to raise an issue at a
> > realtime meeting, then our capacity is approximately full and that issue
> > needs to wait until this can happen.
> 
> This is your opinion, and it's absolutely fine to have differing
> opinions. That's why we have a board so we can decide things, between
> people with differing opinions. Different perspectives and opinions
> only help to enrich the decision making process.
> 
> However it's only an opinion, not a rule. If you think it should be a
> rule, I'd encourage you to propose it and carry it through the process
> to make it a rule.

No need for a rule. I'm just trying to set what I think are reasonable
expectations about available DMB time and time commitments. It's fine if
you disagree, but hopefully this should help you understand what I
consider to be a reasonable time commitment to the DMB, and my personal
minimum commitment that I endeavour to maintain when time is tight.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/attachments/20211109/df9421a8/attachment.sig>