reapplying for SRU developer

[Lukasz Zemczak]

Congratulations on your new SRU uploaders membership!

On 10 October 2017 at 19:37, Dan Streetman <dan.streetman at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Brian Murray <brian at canonical.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 01:17:02PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Brian Murray <brian at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>>> >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Dan Streetman
>>> >> > <dan.streetman at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> Hi, I'm reapplying for SRU developer at the Oct 9 mtg.  Talk to you then.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Dan, I don't think we will have quorum for a meeting on October 9
>>> >> > because of the holiday in the US and Canada.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > We'll let you know when we re-schedule.
>>> >>
>>> >> how about applying via email instead.
>>> >
>>> > These tend to drag on, it be best just to wait until the 23rd of
>>> > October.
>>>
>>> unless the emails drag on for 2 weeks, email will be fine with me.  I
>>> suspect it won't drag on since i've already been through the
>>> application process, and you likely already have your mind made up
>>> currently, but I guess we'll see.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >> As I've already applied before, does anyone have any new questions for
>>> >> me?
>>> >
>>> > Could you talk about what has changed, what work you've done since your
>>> > last application? I think this would be helpful regardless of whether we
>>> > process your application via email or IRC.
>>>
>>> Here's the reasoning for my previous rejection:
>>>
>>> [19:34] <bdmurray> -1 I'd like to see more involvement in the SRU
>>> process before granting you upload rights.
>>> [19:34] <meetingology> -1 I'd like to see more involvement in the SRU
>>> process before granting you upload rights. received from bdmurray
>>> [19:34] <micahg> +0 , while the quality of work is good so far, it's a
>>> bit sporadic, also, I applaud your desire to sponsor uploads, but I
>>> don't feel that in and of itself is a reason to grant upload rights, I
>>> look forward to seeing you back soon with more SRUs completed when we
>>> can hopefully grant you SRU upload permissions
>>> [19:34] <meetingology> +0 , while the quality of work is good so far,
>>> it's a bit sporadic, also, I applaud your desire to sponsor uploads,
>>> but I don't feel that in and of itself is a reason to grant upload
>>> rights, I look forward to seeing you back soon with more SRUs
>>> completed when we can hopefully grant you SRU upload permissions
>>> received from micahg
>>> [19:34] <bdmurray> Perhaps one way to do that is looking at some
>>> things in the SRU queue and then getting an SRU team member
>>> endorsement.
>>> [19:36] <sil2100> +0, all good skill-wise but I also think it's a bit
>>> too soon, certainly a passing vote after a short while of more uploads
>>> + endorsements
>>> [19:36] <meetingology> +0, all good skill-wise but I also think it's a
>>> bit too soon, certainly a passing vote after a short while of more
>>> uploads + endorsements received from sil2100
>>> [19:36] <ddstreet> bdmurray micahg sil2100 sounds good, i'm happy to
>>> reapply after adding some more sponsored sru uploads...you guys don't
>>> mind me bugging you to sponsor my uploads right? ;-)
>>> [19:37] <sil2100> ddstreet: not at all! It would be a pleasure - I'd
>>> say keep up on uploading through sponsors and we'd gladly review you
>>> again in a month or so
>>>
>>>
>>> so you all wanted to see more 'quantity' from me.  These are the SRUs
>>> I've added since then:
>>>
>>> 2017-09-19 15:03Brian MurrayDan Streetmaninitramfs-tools0.103ubuntu4.8trusty
>>> 2017-09-20 13:30ChristianEhrhardtDan Streetmanvlan1.9-3.2ubuntu2.17.04.3zesty
>>> 2017-09-20 13:30ChristianEhrhardtDan Streetmanvlan1.9-3.2ubuntu1.16.04.4xenial
>>> 2017-09-20 13:30ChristianEhrhardtDan Streetmanvlan1.9-3ubuntu10.5trusty
>>> 2017-09-20 13:30ChristianEhrhardtDan Streetmanvlan1.9-3.2ubuntu5artful
>>
>> I consider the vlan uploads as one SRU because it is the same change
>> being uploaded to different releases and the same bug(s) being fixed
>> with all of the uploads.
>>
>>> as well as being present in the Ubuntu Server IRC meeting to provide
>>> SRU status from the STS team (covering for Eric while he was out), and
>>> pestering several of you to help with some of our team's SRUs that
>>> needed reviewing/sponsoring; I also have another initramfs SRU that's
>>> waiting for the last SRU before I can submit it, and a few others
>>> coming as well.
>>>
>>> If that is enough for you, great, but if this is not enough 'quantity'
>>> for your approval, and since the 'significant and sustained'
>>> contributions is obviously completely subjective, what quantity of
>>> SRUs would you like to see before I reapply again?
>>
>> I don't have a great answer for this but don't feel like the two you've
>> provided is enough yet. You say that you have a "few others coming as
>> well" if those are in fact separate SRUs then I think we'd be in a good
>> spot to review your application after that.
>
> sounds good, I updated the DMB agenda to show I'll reapply at the Oct
> 23 mtg.  Thanks!
>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Murray
>
> --
> Devel-permissions mailing list
> Devel-permissions at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/devel-permissions



-- 
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
 Foundations Team
 lukasz.zemczak at canonical.com
 www.canonical.com